Transformational Model: Pela Communicative Action and Systemic Action

  • Andhika Rahmat Saputra Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Putri Zahra Azizah Azman Hashim International Business School (AHIBS), Universitas Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)
  • Adilati Sari Faculty of al-Dirasat al-Islamiyah wa al-’Arabiyah lil Banat, Al-Azhar University, Cairo
Abstract views: 233 , PDF downloads: 76
Keywords: Pela; Maluku; transformational; post-secular

Abstract

This study refers to how the Pela concept within the Maluku. This study relates to how the Pela concept within the Maluku community has a broad influence on the rationalization of the life-world. Modernity, liberalism, and the currents of globalization that fuel technical progress can jeopardize the rationalization of our life-world, which is essential for the integrity and solidarity of society, but neglect of technological progress should not be a proposition. Therefore, researchers, with the help of the dialectic of Habermas and Hardiman’s thoughts with their post-secular thoughts, found a motive to examine how Indonesian multiculturalism has the potential to rationalize the development of society. Using the perspective of Jurgen Habermas and Hardiman based on post-secular theory, the purpose of this study helped researchers study the forms of deliberation from the Pela system. Qualitative research is the research method used. The critical paradigm is the chosen solution. This study combines Pela concepts associated with Habermas and Hardiman’s post-secular thinking and uses Habermas’ critical hermeneutic theory. The results of this study show the decision-making process. In this context, the researchers found the Pela concept as the initial capital of the Maluku people to support technical progress without neglecting the roots of solidarity. This research can be a reference for further researchers in sociology, ethnology, and even human resource management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agger, Ben. Teori Sosial Kritis: Kritik, Penerapan dan Implikasinya. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2003.

Dharapos.com. “M1R Salam Sarane Kampanyekan Hidup Damai dan Bagi-Bagi Masker.” last modified October 26, 2020. https:// www.dharapos.com/2020/10/m1r-salam-sarane-kampanyekan-hidup.html.

Farid, Muhammad. “Dialog dan Toleransi Beragama di Kota Ambon: Perspektif Bekas Pejuang Muslim Ambon.” International Journal of Islamic Thought 9, no. 1 (June, 2016): 44–50. http://www.ukm. my/ijit/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/IJIT-Vol-9-June-2016_5_ 44-50.pdf.

Habermas, Jurgen. Teori Tindakan Komunikatif I : Rasio dan Rasionalitas Masyarakat. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana, 2019.

Habermas, Jurgen. Teori Tindakan Komunikatif II : Kritik Atas Rasio Fungsionalis. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana, 2019.

Hakis, Hakis. “Komunikasi Antar Umat Beragama di Kota Ambon.” Jurnal Komunikasi Islam 5, no. 1 (2015): 98–113. http://jki.uin sby.ac.id/index.php/jki/article/view/73.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Demokrasi dan Sentimentalitas: Dari Bangsa Setan-Setan, Radikalisme Agama Sampai Post-Sekularisme. Yogya- karta: Kanisius, 2018.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Demokrasi Deliberatif : Menimbang ‘Negara Hukum’ dan ‘Ruang ‘Publik’ dalam Teori Diskursus Jürgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2009.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Kritik Ideologi: Menyingkap Kepentingan Pengetahuan Bersama Jurgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Buku Baik, 2004.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Melampaui Positivisme dan Modernitas. Yogya-karta: Kanisius, 2003.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif : Ilmu, Masyarakat, Politik dan Postmodernisme Menurut Juergen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2008.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Seni Memahami Hermeneutik Dari Schleiermacher Sampai Derrida. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2015.

Hasudungan, Anju Nofarof, and Lianda Dewi Sartika. “Model Pendidikan Perdamaian Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Pela Gandong Pada Pembelajaran IPS Pasca Rekonsiliasi Konflik Ambon.” Indonesian Journal of Social Science Education (IJSSE) 2, no.1 (2020): 20–32. https://doi.org/10.29300/ijsse.v2i1.2658.

Hehanussa, Jozef. “Pela dan Gandong: Sebuah Model untuk Kehidupan Bersama dalam Konteks Pluralisme Agama di Maluku.” Gema Teologi 33, no. 1 (2009): 1-15. https://journal-theo.ukdw.ac.id/ index.php/gema/article/view/40.

Jena, Yeremias. “Toleransi Antarumat Beragama di Indonesia dari Perspektif Etika Kepedulian.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora 12, no. 2 (2019): 183-95. https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v12i2.5941.

Montana, Osbert, Riris Loisa, and Lusia Savitri Setyo Utami. “Masyarakat dan Kearifan Budaya Lokal (Bentuk Pela Masyarakat di Negeri Batu Merah Kota Ambon Pasca Rekonsiliasi).” Koneksi 2, no. 2 (2018): 507-514. https://doi.org/ 10.24912/kn.v2i2.3930.

Nisa, Suvia. “Toleransi Masyarakat Beda Agama.” Repository Universitas Airlangga (2019): 1-22. https://repository.unair.ac.id/ 87540/1/_JURNAL_SUVIA%20NISA_071511433090.pdf.

Nugroho, Heru. “Demokrasi dan Demokratisasi: Sebuah Kerangka Konseptual untuk Memahami Dinamika Sosial-Politik di Indonesia.” JPS: Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi 1, no. 1 (2012): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v1i1.23419.

Nuris, Anwar. “Tindakan Komunikatif: Sekilas Tentang Pemikiran Juergen Habermas.” Al-Balagh: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi 1, no. 1 (2016): 39-66. https://doi.org/10.22515/balagh.v1i1.45.

Perda Provinsi Maluku No. 16 Tahun 2019, Peraturan Daerah Tentang Penataan Desa Adat.

Perda Kota Ambon No. 7 Tahun 2012, Peraturan Daerah Tentang Negri.

Piris, Sammy, and Sonny Tilaar. “Graha Wisata Adat Pela Gandong di Maluku (Simbiosis Mutualisme).” Jurnal Arsitektur DASENG 2, no. 3 (2013): 79–88. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/ daseng/article/view/3626.

Priastana, Jo. “Teori Tindakan Komunikasi Jurgen Habermas Sebagai Titik Pijak Dialog Antar Agama.” M.A. thesis, Universitas Indonesia, 1998. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx? id=184614.

Pusey, M. Habermas: Dasar dan Konteks Pemikirannya. Yogyakarta: Resist Book, 2011.

Rahawarin, Yunus. “Kerjasama Antar Umat Beragama: Studi Rekonsiliasi Konflik Agama di Maluku dan Tual.” Kalam 7, no. 1 (2013): 95-120. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v7i1.451.

Ritiauw, Yakob Godlif Malatuny, and Samuel Patra. “Eksistensi Pela Gandong Sebagai Civic Culture.” Social Science Education Journal 5, no. 2 (2018): 35-46. https://doi.org/10.15408/sd.v5i2. 10554.

Roubrenda N. Ralahallo, “Kultur Damai Berbasis Tradisi Pela dalam Perspektif Psikologi Sosial.” Jurnal Psikologi 36, no. 2 (2009): 177–88. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.7894.

Rosyidi, Mohammad Fuad Al Amin Mohammad. “Konsep Toleransi dalam Islam dan Implementasinya di Masyarakat Indonesia.” Jurnal Madaniyah 9, no. 2 (2019): 277-96. https://journal.stit pemalang.ac.id/index.php/madaniyah/article/download/129/113/.

Setiawan, Arif. “Konsep Ruang Publik Menurut Jürgen Habermas.” Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga (2015): 1-80. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/19211/2/08510001_bab-i_iv-atau-v_daftar-pustaka.pdf.

Setyowati, Yuli. “Tindakan Komunikatif Masyarakat ‘Kampung Preman’ dalam Proses Pemberdayaan.” Jurnal ASPIKOM 3, no. 1 (2016): 16-32. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i1.96.

Sholahudin, Umar. “Membedah Teori Kritis Mazhab Frankfurt.” Jurnal of Urban Sociology 3, no. 2 (2020): 71-89. https://journal.uwks. ac.id/index.php/sosiologi/article/view/1246.

Sholeh, Moh. “Pesantren dan Kontruksi Realitas Sosial.” Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial 7, no.1 (2016): 105-11. http:// jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/aspirasi/article/view/1283.

Souhaly, Robert. “Sasi Adat: Kajian Terhadap Pelaksanaan Sasi Adat dan Implikasinya.” KENOSIS: Jurnal Kajian Teologi 2, no. 2 (2016): 192–205. https://doi.org/10.37196/kenosis.v2i2.41.

Supriadi, Yadi. “Relasi Ruang Publik dan Pers Menurut Habermas.” KJ: Kajian Jurnalisme 1, no. 1 (2017): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24198/ kj.v1i1.12228.

Undang-Undang no. 7 Tahun 2012, Undang-Undang Tentang Penanganan Konflik Sosial.

Wenno, I.H., and Wilma Akihary. “Kebutuhan Model Budaya Pela Gandong Berbasis Pembangunan di Provinsi Maluku.” LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra 5, no. 2 (2011): 128-33. https:// doi.org/10.18860/ling.v5i2.626.

Published
2021-12-21
How to Cite
Rahmat Saputra, Andhika, Putri Zahra Azizah, and Adilati Sari. 2021. “Transformational Model: Pela Communicative Action and Systemic Action: ”. Karsa: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 29 (2), 354-87. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v29i2.4742.
Section
Articles