Judicial Mediation: Is Reconciliation Impossible in Divorce Cases?

Syaikhu; Sabarudin Ahmad; Muhammad Luthfi Setiarno Putera

doi:10.19105/al-manhaj.v5i2.11887

Syaikhu Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya
Sabarudin Ahmad Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya
Muhammad Luthfi Setiarno Putera Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya

https://doi.org/10.19105/al-manhaj.v5i2.11887

Abstract views: 91 ,

PDF downloads: 96

Keywords: Mediasi, Perceraian, Rekonsiliasi, Peradilan

Abstract

Judicial mediation attempts to realize the principle of peace in civil cases, however, in its implementation in religious courts there is still minimal success in producing peace agreements, especially in divorce cases. This research aims to analyze whether it is impossible to reconcile the parties in a divorce case through judicial mediation. This research is empirical legal research with a case approach. The data collection methods involve observation, interviews, and documentation. These data are then validated using the triangulation method. After data validation, the next step is to analyze using an analytical method using the theory of legal objectives. Research findings show that successful mediation in divorce cases is not impossible, it's just that divorce cases are very difficult to reconcile, because the parties who submit divorce cases to court usually have reached the climax of domestic problems, and some have not lived together for a long time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Amarini, Indriati. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Efektif Dan Efesien Melalui Optimalisasi Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Kosmik Hukum 16, no. 2 (2016): 87–106. https://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/KOSMIK/article/view/1954.

Aziz, Abdul, and Lukman Hakim. “Pelaksanaan Mediasi Perceraian Di Peradilan Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Al-Ashlah 1, no. 2 (2022): 103–15.

Bintoro, Rahadi Wasi. “Kajian Ontologis Lembaga Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Yuridika 31, no. 1 (2016): 121–42. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v31i1.1959.

Elvia, Evi Eka, Abdul Mujib, Azhar Nor, and Muhammad Imanuddin Akbar. “BASYARNAS as a Place for Dispute Resolution of Musyarakah Financing in Sharia Banking in the Disruption Era.” El-Mashlahah 13, no. 1 (2023): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v13i1.5345.

Fauzi, Rahmat, and Faisal. “Efektifitas Mediasi Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perceraian (Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi Dan Pengadilan Agama Payukumbuh Tahun 2015-2017).” Soematra Law Review 1, no. 2 (2018): 314–34. https://ejournal.lldikti10.id/index.php/soumlaw/article/view/3722.

Fikri, Muhammad Ali Rusdi Bedong, Muhyiddin Salim, Salman Abdul Muthalib, and Ali Abubakar. “Transformation of Maqāṣid Shari‘āh in Divorce Mediation in Religious Courts: Revitalization of the Bugis-Mandar Customs, Indonesia.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2023): 431–54. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.9141.

Hasballah, Khairuddin, and Rahmadani. “Studi Pemikiran Ibnu Qayyim Al-Jauziyyah Tentang Hakam Dan Relevansinya Dengan Mediasi Di Pengadilan Agama.” Samarah 3, no. 1 (2019): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v3i1.4430.

Hidayat, Maskur. Strategi & Taktik Mediasi Berdasarkan Perma No. 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

Hirdayadi, Israr, and Khairun Nisak. “Persepsi Masyarakat Gampong Mee Pangwa Kecamatan Trienggadeng Tentang Mediasi Perkara Pidana Dalam Peradilan Adat.” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum 7, no. 2 (2018): 243–64. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v7i2.3974.

HSB, Ali Marwan. “Mengkritisi Pemberlakuan Teori Fiksi Hukum (Criticising Enactmen of Law Fiction Theory).” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 16, no. 3 (2016): 251–64. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2016.V16.251-264.

Ilham, Rini Fahriyani, and Ermi Suhasti. “Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris: Studi Putusan No. 181/Pdt. G/2013/PA.Yk.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 9, no. 1 (2016): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2016.09105.

Ilyas, Syahrizal Abbas, and Iman Jauhari. “Efektifitas Peran Hakim Sebagai Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2017): 83–100.

Karjoko, Lego, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, Abdul Kadir Jaelani, Jaco Barkhuizen, and Muhammad Jihadul Hayat. “The Urgency of Restorative Justice on Medical Dispute Resolution in Indonesia.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial 16, no. 2 (2021): 362–92. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v16i2.5314.

Karmawan. “Diskursus Mediasi Dan Upaya Penyelesaiannya.” Kordinat 16, no. 1 (2017): 107–26. https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v16i1.6457.

Karmuji, Muhammad. “Peran Dan Fungsi Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata.” Ummul Qura 7, no. 1 (2016): 36–52. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/pantura/index.php/qura/article/view/3040.

Kusumaningrum, Arum, Yunanto, and Benny Riyanto. “Efektifitas Mediasi Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang.” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2017): 1–10. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/15666.

“Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya Kelas IA Tahun 2020.” Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya, 2020.

“Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya Kelas IA Tahun 2021.” Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya, 2021.

“Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya Kelas IA Tahun 2022.” Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya, 2022. https://pa-palangkaraya.go.id/laporan-tahunan/.

Lizuardi, Amiril, Sudirman, and Ahmad Izzuddin. “Itikad Baik Para Pihak Dalam Pelaksanaan Mediasi Di Pengadilan Agama.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 9, no. 2 (2017): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v9i2.6807.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2015.

Musawwamah, Siti. “Mediasi Integratif Di Pengadilan Agama Pamekasan.” Nuansa: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Dan Keagamaan Islam 11, no. 2 (2014): 341–64. http://ejournal.iainmadura.ac.id/index.php/nuansa/article/view/537.

Nurhidayat, Muh., and Firman Muin. “Efektifitas Mediasi Pada Kasus Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Sinjai.” Tomalebbi 4, no. 2 (2017): 112–23.

Palendeng, Sonny Engelbert, Merry E Kalalo, and Deasy Soeikromo. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Dagang Dikaitkan Trademark Dispute Resolution Is Associated With Legal” 16, no. 2 (2021): 274–86.

Saladin, Tomi. “Penerapan Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama.” Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 2, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24235/mahkamah.v2i2.2034.

Sari, Septi Wulan. “Mediasi Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016.” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 5, no. 1 (2017): 1–16. https://ejournal.uinsatu.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/view/669.

Sikri, Muh. Syafwan, Kairuddin Karim, and Muhammad Akbar Fhad Syahril. “Eksplikasi Mediasi Terhadap Perkara Perceraian.” Julia: Jurnal Litigasi Amsir 9, no. 2 (2022): 134–41.

Sunarsi, Dessy, Yuherman, and Sumiyati. “Efeketifitas Peran Mediator Non Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Pulau Jawa.” Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti 2, no. 2 (2018): 138–51. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v2i2.26.

Taufiqurohman. “Implementasi Mediasi Pada Proses Perceraian TKI Di Pengadilan Agama Ponorogo.” Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 20, no. 1 (2021): 115–30. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i1.2826.

Utsman, Sabian. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Progressif. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014. http://digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/2293/.

Widihastuti, Setiati, Sri Hartini, and Eny Kusdarini. “Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kesehatan Di Jogja Mediation Center.” Socia 14, no. 1 (2017): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v14i1.15889.

Wijaya, Agung Supra. “Efeketifitas Mediasi Dalam Pencegahan Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Kota Bengkulu.” Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Peradilan 2, no. 1 (2017): 1–10.

Zaidah, Yusna, and Mutia Ramadhania Normas. “Mediasi Online Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Era Pandemi.” Journal of Islamic and Law Studies 5, no. 2 (2021): 334–48. https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v5i3.5847.