Various Language Expressions in The Criticism of Madurese People on Social Media Field

  • Akhmad Sofyan Universitas Jember
  • Panakajaya Hidayatullah Universitas Jember
  • Ali Badrudin Universitas Jember
Abstract views: 373 , PDF downloads: 230
Keywords: criticism, Madurese people, social media, Situbondo

Abstract

The Madurese community in Situbondo is a group of people who are still 'unfamiliar' with the internet media (social media). Their lack of understanding in using social media often creates problems in society. This article is the result of ethnography of communication research which discusses criticism behavior of Madurese people in Situbondo in social media. It comprehensively analyzes aspects of use of language choice, motive of language choice and language formulation expressed by informants. Research findings show that: 1) Situbondo people express criticism in social media by using code of Madurese language and mixed Madurese-Indonesia and Madurese-English, and they are expressed through some patterns which are humor, figurative, threatening and affirmative, direct and indirect satire, Kiyai quote and lyrical/poetical pattern; 2) Some motives background of choice of language code in expressing criticism are influenced by aspects of hierarchy in a context of diglosia society, politic of identity; dimension of ethnic group and psychological and cultural motives. Formulation of these findings explain that most of criticism model of Madurese people in Situbondo through social media is manifestation of habit in expressing criticism in real world. Something avoided is criticism model using sarcasm sentence, containing hate speech, offending pride, social status, family and feeling of interlocutors. Expressive and outspoken criticism in social media are also considered to be dangerous and unacceptable by people because they create ‘floating’ (unclear) interpretation, and potential to be misinterpreted. While some acceptable criticism are criticism model expressed by fine language and expressed by humor, figurative, fine satire and lyrical/poetical patterns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hamers, J.F. Bilinguality and Bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Haryono, A. “Pola Komunikasi Warga NU Etnis Madura Sebagai Refleksi Budaya Paternalistik.” Jurnal Humaniora 23, No. 2 (2011).

Hidayatullah, P. Dangdut Madura Situbondoan. Yogyakarta: Diandra Kreatif, 2017.

Holmes, J. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman Group UK Limited, 1997.

Marzali, A. Apakah Etnografi, dalam Metode Etnografi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 1997.

Santoso, T. “Kajian Sosiobudaya Kumpulan Sajak Madura, “Akulah Darahmu” Karya D. Zawawi Imron”. Jurnal Humaniora, 16, No.3 (2004), 313–319.

Sarmini. “Ruang dan kultur Kekerasan Domestik: Pengalaman Perempuan Madura di Kemayoran Baru Surabaya”. Jurnal Humaniora, 20, No. 1 (2008), 38–50.

Savile-Troike, M. The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Basil Blackwell Ltd, 1989.

Soegianto. Unda-Usuk Bahasa Madura. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1997.

Sofyan, A. Variasi, Keunikan, dan Penggunaan Bahasa Madura. Surabaya: Balai Bahasa Surabaya, 2008.

Spradley, J. P. Participant Observation. New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.

Sukardi, A. Kasusastraan Madura Kembang Sataman. Jember: Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Jember, 2001.

Wibisono, B. Etnografi Komunikasi Dalam Penelitian Perilaku Berbahasa. Jember: Jember University Press, 2007.

Wibisono, B. “Faktor Penentu Pemilihan Varian Bahasa oleh Multibahasawan Etnis Madura di Jember dalam Obrrolan”. Jurnal Humaniora 19, no. 1 (2007): 52-61, https://doi.org/10.22146/ jh.v19i1.891.

Published
2020-06-12
How to Cite
Sofyan, Akhmad, Panakajaya Hidayatullah, and Ali Badrudin. 2020. “Various Language Expressions in The Criticism of Madurese People on Social Media Field”. KARSA Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 28 (1), 141-71. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v28i1.2352.
Section
Articles