Peer Review Process
Articles submitted to Tarètan Journal will be processed through a review format by the editor and reviewed independently by peer reviewers. The review process applies the Double-Blind method. The reviewer's decision is the editor's main priority in making decisions. The time required for reviewers to complete the round review process is three weeks. Generally, prospective reviewers will be selected based on reputation and suitability of their expertise. The decision to publish, amend, or reject is based on their report/recommendation. After review, there will be four types of editorial decisions based on reviewer recommendations:
> Accept Submissions: Submissions will be accepted without revision.
> Revisions Required: Submissions will be accepted after minor changes are made.
> Resubmit for Review: The submission needs rework, but with significant changes, is acceptable. However, this requires a second round of review.
> Reject Submission: The submission will not be published in the journal.
