Shifting Paradigm of Modern Islam Fundamentalism as Islamized Space Autonomy in Indonesia
Abstract views: 639
,
PDF downloads: 480
Abstract
Idealism various groups of political Islam failed to change the political landscape of the Middle East and some other regions. Political Islam is not won power, while the old regimes are still in power. Western powers are increasingly plugging hegemony (political, economic, cultural) in the region. Political Islam is also not always successfully display the values contained in the ideals of fundamentalism in the form of the application of religious laws in politics. Islamic fundamentalists in some places only produce changes that are not significant in the fields of law, politics and economics. In this case, fundamentalism does emphasize the application of Sharia totally, but often do not care about the character of the political system. The variant of the traditional and modern fundamentalism fundamentalism can be seen also shift to the neo-fundamentalism. Orientation and strategy of neo-fundamentalism is the master of society through social action, far from being revolutionary, neo-fundamentalists are now entering into civil society and political classes. Although the character of the revolution is lost, the symbols of Islam seeped into the public and political discourse of Islam. Neo-fundamentalism seeks re-islamization society at grassroots level, and no longer through the country. Fundamentalists are directing the struggle in the birth of an Islamic society and Islamic space. This shift has seen as a symbol of Islamic fundamentalism in the political failure that resulted in a significant change in the weight of thought and movement.
Copyright (c) 2017 by KARSA. All right reserved
Downloads
References
Achmad, Adang Darmawan & Nurjan, Syarifan. “Attachment as Character Education in Boarding School”, November 16th, 2016, www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=25874210
Ahmad Azhar Basyir. “Reaktualisasi, Pendekatan Sosiologis Tidak Selalu Relevan.” dalam Polemik Reaktualisasi Ajaran Islam. ed. Iqbal AS. Jakarta: Pustaka Panjimas, 1988, 103-116.
Ahmad, Baso. “Pengantar Penerjemah: Posmodernisme sebagai Kritik Islam – Kontribusi Metodologis ‘Kritik Nalar’ Muhammad Abed al-Jabiri.” dalam Muhammad Abed al-Jabiri. Post-tradisionalisme Islam. trans.: Ahmad Baso. Jogjakarta: LKiS, 2000, ix-liv.
Anonymous, November 17th, 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/22/brutal-fight-of-bangladeshs-secular-voices-to-be-heard
Anonymous. “Secularism And Religion: The Attempted Coup In Turkey”, November 18th, 2016, http://www.europenowjournal.org/2016/10/31/secularism-and-religion-the-attempted-coup-in-turkey/
Arkoun, Mohammed. Nalar Islami dan Nalar Modern: Berbagai Tantangan dan Jalan Baru. ab. Rahayu S. Hidayat. Jakarta: INIS, 1994.
Arkoun, Mohammed. Tekstualitas Al-Qur’an: Kritik terhadap Ulumul Qur’an. trans.:. Khoiron Nahdliyyin. Jogjakarta: LKiS, 2002.
Armstrong, Karen. Berperang Demi Tuhan: Fundamentalisme dalam Islam, Kristen, dan Yahudi. ab. Satrio Wahono, et. al. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu Semesta, 2001.
Ayubi, Nazih. Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Arab World. London and New York: Routledge, 1991.
Beger, Peter, dan Luckmann,Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Penguin Books, 1991.
Binder, Leonard. Islamic Liberalism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Bishop, Dale L. “Review on Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Arab World”, November 17th, 2016I, International Journal of Middle East Studies. Volume 25, Issue 4 November (1993): 714-716.
Burke, Edmund III, dan Lapidus, Ira M. (eds.,) Islam, Politics, and Social Movements. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
Caldwell, Larry W. “Towards the New Discipline of Ethnohermeneutics: Questioning the Relevancy of Western Hermeneutical Methods in the Asian Context.” Journal of Asian Mission. Vol. 1, Nr. 1 (March 1999): 21-43.
Choueiri, Youssef M. Islamic Fundamentalism. Boston, Massachussets: Twayne Publishers, 1990.
Dekmejian, R. Hrair. “Islamic Revival: Catalysts, Categories, and Consequences.” Dalam The Politics of Islamic Revivalism: Diversity and Unity, ed. Shireen T. Hunter. 3-19. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1988.
Eickelman, Dale F. dan James Piscatori. Muslim Politics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Esack, Farid. Qur’an, Liberation and Pluralism: An Islamic Perspective of Interreligious Solidarity against Oppression. Oxford: Oneworld, 1997.
Gadamer, Hans Georg. Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward, 1975.
Huff, Peter. “The Challenge of Fundamentalism for Interreligious Dialogue,” Cross Current (Spring-Summer, 2002). http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/ m2096 /2000_Spring- Summer/63300895/print.jhtml
ICG, Indonesian Backgrounder: Why Salafism and Terorism Mostly Don’t Mix, Asia Report No. 83, 13 September 2004.
Jainuri, Achmad. Orientasi Ideologi Gerakan Islam. Surabaya: LPAM, 2004.
Josef Bleichert, Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.
Kaplan, Seth D. “A System Approach to Social Disintegration”, April 15th, 2017, https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/a-systems-approach-to-social-disintegration.
Keyman, E. Fuat. “Modernity, Secularism and Islam: The Case of Turkey”, November 19th, 2016, http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0263276407075008
Khan, Ahmed. “Islamic modernist reformist thought through the study of sir sayyed ahmed muhammad iqbal”, November 17th, 2016, http://ebooks.rahnuma.org/religion/Sir_Syed_Ahmed_Khan/islamic_modenist__reformist_thought_through_the_study_of_sir_sayyed_ahmend__muhammad_iqbal.pdf.
Kim, Young Yun. Communication and Cross Cultural Adaptation: an Integrative Theory. Clevedon, Phi, Multilingual Matters, Ltd., 1995.
King, Richard. Agama, Orientalisme, dan Poskolonialisme. ab. Agung Prihantoro. Jogjakarta: Qalam, 2001.
Lee, Robert D. Mencari Islam Autentik: Dari Nalar Puitis Iqbal Hingga Nalar Kritis Arkoun. ab. Ahmad Baiquni. Bandung: Mizan, 2000.
Leidecker, Kurt F. “Hermeneutics,” dalam Dagobert D. Runes, Dictionary of Philosophy . Totowa, New Jersey: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1976.
Lees, Mark. “Fascism and Fundamentalism – Two Sides of the Same Coin?”, March 29th, 2017,
https://owlcation.com/social-sciences/Fascism-and-Fundamentalism-Two-Sides-of-the-Same-Coin
Madjid, Nurcholish. “Kata Sambutan: Universalisme Agama dan Kenisbian Peradaban.” In M. Dawam Rahardjo. Ensiklopedi Al-Qur’an: Tafsir Sosial Berdasarkan Konsep-konsep Kunci. Jakarta: Paramadina, 1996. xxvii-xxxiii.
Mamouri, Ali . “The Roots of Radicalism in Political Islam”, November 14th, 2016. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/10/radicalism-political-islam-roots-sunni-shiite-fundamentalist.html.
Marimaa, Kalmer. “The Many Faces of Fanaticism”, November 17th, 2016, http://www.ksk.edu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/KVUOA_Toimetised_14_2_kalmer_marimaa.pdf
Palmer, Richard E. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger and Gadamer (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969).
Rahman, Fazlur. “Roots of Islamic Neo-Fundamentalism.” Dalam Change in the Muslim World, ed. Philip H Stoddard, David C. Cuthell and Margaret V. Sullivan (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1981.
Roy, Olivier. The Failure of Political Islam. Trans. Carol Volk. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1994.
Safi, Louay. The Foundation of Knowledge: A Comparative Study in Islamic and Western Methods of Inquiry . Selangor Darul Ehsan: International Islamic University Press, 1996.
Shepard, William. “Fundamentalism Christian and Islamic,” Religion 17 (1987): 355-378.
Shepard, William. “What is ‘Islamic Fundamentalism’?,” Studies in Religion 17, 1 (1988): 5-25.
Sihbudi, Riza, et.al. Islam dan Radikalisme di Indonesia. Jakarta: LIPI Press, 2005.
Sivan, Emmanuel. Radical Islam: Medieval Theology and Modern Politics. Enlarged Edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1985.
Steinfels, Peter. “Fundamentalism: the 20th Century's Last Ideology”, November 17th, 2016, http://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/06/us/fundamentalism-the-20th-century-s-last-ideology.html
Voll, John Obert. “Relations Among Islamist Groups,” in Political Islam: Revolution, Radicalism, or Reform?. Ed. John L. Esposito. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., 1997, 231-247.
Voll, John Obert. Islam Continuity and Change in the Modern World. Second Edition. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1994.
Zuckerman, Phil. “Secularism, Religion, and Racism: Who is more likely to be racist, the strongly religious or the strongly secular?”, November 17th, 2016, https://www.psychology today.com/blog/the-secular-life/201408/secularism-religion-and-racism.
The journal operates an Open Access policy under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial Share-Alike license. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
