Relevansi Prinsip Kesopanan Leech dengan Pendidikan Karakter pada Tuturan Guru dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran Siswa Usia Dini

Fithriyah Rahmawati; Luthfatun Nisa'

doi:10.19105/kiddo.v1i1.10253

Fithriyah Rahmawati Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura
Luthfatun Nisa' Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura

https://doi.org/10.19105/kiddo.v1i1.10253

Abstract views: 81 ,

PDF downloads: 59

Abstract

This research aims to discuss the extent to which politeness strategies are applied by teachers and students in classroom interactions and to analyze the types of politeness maxims based on the theory proposed by Geoffrey Leech. The method used in this research is qualitative with a descriptive approach. The research subjects involved are 1st-grade elementary school students, educators, educational staff, and parents of students at SDI Al Uswah Pamekasan. The findings of this research consist of the distribution of maxims analyzed based on Leech's politeness principles theory, with the percentage of usage of politeness principles and the 6 maxims of the politeness principle of tact ranking highest in their usage in conversations between teachers and students during the course of learning. The six maxims proposed by Leech include the maxim of tact, the maxim of generosity, the maxim of praise, the maxim of modesty, the maxim of agreement, and the maxim of sympathy. The conclusion of this research is that each maxim proposed by Leech can be found in the interaction process between teachers and students, with language delivery based on the principle of politeness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bogdan, Robert C., dan Sari Knopp Biklen. 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. 5th ed. Boston, USA: Pearson Education.

Brown, Penelope, Stephen C. Levinson, dan John J. Gumperz. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Reissue edition. Cambridge Cambridgeshire ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. “Politeness and Impoliteness.” Dalam Sociopragmatics, 5:391–436. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Denham, Kristin, dan Anne Lobeck. 2010. Linguistics for Everyone: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Boston, USA: Wadsworth.

Duhita, Arinanda Alma, dan Ida Zulaeha. 2018. “The Politeness Speech of Primary School Teacher in the Character Building of Learners.” Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia 7 (2): 112–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/seloka.v7i2.25182.

Jannedy, Stefanie, Robert Poletto, dan Tracey L Weldon, ed. 1994. Language Files. 6th ed. United Stated: Ohio State University Press.

Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. OUP USA Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics.

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.

Ramadania, Fajarika. 2016. “PEMBENTUKAN KARAKTER SISWA DENGAN MEMANFAATKAN PRINSIP KESANTUNAN PADA TUTURAN DIREKTIF DI LINGKUNGAN SEKOLAH.” Stilistika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya 1 (1): 8.

Rohali, Rohali. 2011. “LINGUISTIC POLITENESS AS A PILLAR OF CHARACTER BUILDING: A SOCIO-PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIF.” Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 24.

Umayah, Siti, I.N.A Putra, dan G.A.P Suprianti. 2017. “POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN TEACHERSTUDENTS CLASSROOM INTERACTION AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK PGRI 1 SINGARAJA.” Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha (JPBI) 5 (2). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPBI/article/view/13474/8443.

Wati, Dyah Rohma. 2015. “PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER DAN KAITANNYA DENGAN KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA.” Prosiding Prasasti, 6.

Widyawari, Caecilia Petra Gading May, dan Ida Zulaeha. 2016. “REPRESENTASI IDEOLOGI DALAM TUTURAN SANTUN PARA PEJABAT NEGARA PADA TALK SHOW MATA NAJWA.” Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.15294/seloka.v5i1.12737.

Yule, George. 2014. The Study of Language. Cambridge University Press.

Zamzani, Zamzani, Tadkiroatun Musfiroh, Siti Maslakhah, dan Ari Lisyorini. 2011. “PENGEMBANGAN ALAT UKUR KESANTUNAN BAHASA INDONESIA DALAM INTERAKSI SOSIAL BERSEMUKA” 10: 16.