Urgency of Falsum in Indonesian Criminal Justice System as Basis for Revision; An Islamic Perspective

Mia Amiati; Taufik Rachman; R.B. Muhammad Zainal Abidin

doi:10.19105/al-lhkam.v19i2.13141

Mia Amiati Universitas Airlangga Surabaya
Taufik Rachman Universitas Airlangga Surabaya
R.B. Muhammad Zainal Abidin Universitas Airlangga Surabaya

https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v19i2.13141

Abstract views: 254 ,

PDF downloads: 391

Keywords: Revision; Falsum; Legal Reform; Islamic law; Indonesia

Abstract

In Indonesian Islamic law, "falsum" has no direct equivalent. However, this idea matters in legal debates of beliefs, utterances, and behaviors. Falsum corrects final decisions in Germany and the Dutch during Revision. Indonesian prosecutors might request Revision, but the Constitutional Court limited this power to convicts and their descendants, extending unfairness. Revision should remedy bribery, document forgery, conflict of interest, and perjury by using the idea of falsum. However, falsum implementation in Indonesia raises problems about its compatibility with Islamic values. The study investigates how addressing falsum, in accordance with the principles of justice and utility, can lead to fairer legal reforms and bolster public confidence in the judiciary, especially within Indonesia's predominantly Muslim community. It examines the possibilities and drawbacks of legalizing falsum in Indonesia using normative, theoretical, and comparative approaches. It contends that the notion of falsum can provide a persuasive rationale for legal reforms in Indonesia's criminal court system. It also enables law enforcement officials and future drafters of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) to understand the evolution of Revision because granting prosecutors the authority to initiate Revision based on falsum is crucial for ensuring greater justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akinsulorea, Adedoyin. “The Nigeria Police Philosophy and Administration of Criminal Justice Post 2015: Interrogating the Dissonance.” Sriwijaya Law Review 4, no. 2 (2020): 136–53. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol4.Iss2.432.pp136-153.

Ardianti, Siti. “Fiqh al-Ḥadīth: Hakim Ada Tiga Golongan.” Shahih: Jurnal Ilmu Kewahyuan 53, no. 2 (2022): 53–61. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.51900/shh.v5i2.14674.

Ariefulloh, Ariefulloh, Hibnu Nugroho, Angkasa Angkasa, and Riris Ardhanariswari. “Restorative Justice-Based Criminal Case Resolution in Salatiga, Indonesia: Islamic Law Perspective and Legal Objectives.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan 23, no. 1 (2023): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.18326/IJTIHAD.V23I1.19-36.

Dwiono, Sugeng, A. Kumedi Ja’far, and Slamet Haryadi. “An Analysis on the Omnibus Law and Its Challenges in Indonesia: The Perspectives of the Constitutional and the Islamic Law.” Samarah 8, no. 2 (2024): 706–25. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.22720.

Efendi, Roni. “Pidana Mati dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Pidana Islam.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 16, no. 1 (2017): 125. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v16i1.965.

Fraher, Richard M. “Conviction According to Conscience: The Medieval Jurists’ Debate Concerning Judicial Discretion and the Law of Proof.” Law and History Review 7, no. 1 (1989): 23–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/743777.

Hadjon, Philipus M., and Tatiek Sri Djamiati. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2017.

Hamzah, Andi. Naskah Akademik RUU Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2009.

Hans, Valerie P. “Introduction: Lay Participation in Legal Decision Making.” Law and Policy 25, no. 2 (2003): 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9930.2003.00141.x.

Holvast, Nina, Joost Nan, and Sjarai Lestrade. “Between Legal Certainty and Doubt: The Developments in the Procedure to Overturn Wrongful Convictions in the Netherlands.” Erasmus Law Review 13, no. 1 (2020): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5553/elr.000188.

Junaedi, Junaedi, Anas Yusuf, and Rumanul Hidayat. “Scenario Ferdy Sambo Orders to Kill Brigadir Joshua Maintaining Family Dignity, Executions, or Motives.” International Journal of Business, Law, and Education 4, no. 1 (2023): 233–48. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v4i1.158.

Kadafi, Binziad. Peninjauan Kembali: Koreksi Kesalahan dalam Putusan. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2023.

———. “Peninjauan Kembali oleh Jaksa.” Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung, 2022. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel-hukum/2045-peninjauan-kembali-oleh-jaksa-binziad-kadafi.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. “Statistik TPK Berdasarkan Profesi/Jabatan.” Jakarta, 2024. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi-data/statistik/penindakan-2.

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. “Siaran Pers: KY Usulkan 33 Hakim Dijatuhi Sanksi.” Jakarta, 2024. https://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/frontend/pers_release_detail/330/ky-usulkan-hakim-dijatuhi-sanksi.

Kuswanto, Edi, Muhammad Nurul Mubin, Suharsono, and Dwi Setia Kurniawan. “Internalizing Islamic Moderation: A Model Approach for Educational Institutions.” IJoReSH: Indonesian Journal of Religion, Spirituality, and Humanity 2, no. 1 (2023): 93–113. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijoresh.v2i1.93-113.

Lindemann, Michael, and Fabienne Lienau. “Mechanisms for Correcting Judicial Errors in Germany.” Erasmus Law Review 13, no. 4 (2020): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.5553/elr.000177.

Madkur, Muhammad Salam. Al-Qāda Fi Al-Islām. Kairo: Dār an-Nahdah, n.d.

Majid, Dhira. Kepemimpinan dalam Perspektif Al-Qura’an. Aceh: Searfiqh, 2019.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Acara Pidana: Suatu Tinjauan Khusus Terhadap Surat Dakwaan, Eksepsi dan Putusan Peradilan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

Munawaroh, H. “Restorative Justice in Settling Minor Criminal Disputes in Ponorogo, East Java: An Islamic Law Perspective.” Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam. core.ac.uk, 2019. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/279111469.pdf.

Muntalib, Dita Wardhani. “Testimonium De Auditu Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam (Studi Putusan MK No. 65/PUU-VIII/2010).” Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2018. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/10746.

P, Erlinda Yulia, and Sulistyanta. “Advocate Rights of Immunity as a Criminal Law Effort in the Criminal Justice System.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) 10, no. 4 (2023): 641–48. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i4.4507.

Patramijaya, Arief. “Criminal Legal Protection for Bona Fide Third Parties Over Assets in Corruption and Money Laundering Cases.” Sriwijaya Law Review 8, no. 1 (2024): 171–82. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.2159.pp171-182.

Qazwaini, Abi ’Abdillah Muhammad bin Yazid. Sunan Ibnu Majah Juz 1 / Abi ’Abdillah Muhammad Bin Yazid Al-Qazwaini. Bairut: Dar al-Fikr, 2008.

Rachman, T. “Can the Indonesian Criminal Justice System Be Enhanced by Replacing the Mandatory Prosecution System with a Discretionary One, like That Used in Australia?” Sydney: Victoria University, 2016. https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/31832.

Ruhly Kesuma Dinata, M., Irhammudin, Della Monica, and Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo. “Good Governance and Local Wisdom in Law Enforcement.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 5, no. 2 (2022): 227–42. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v5i2.6740.

Sakti, Yayang Susila. “Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum: Antara Kepastian dan Keadilan.” Arena Hukum 7, no. 1 (2014): 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2014.00701.5.

Saputra, Rian, Muhammad Khalif Ardi, Pujiyono Pujiyono, and Sunny Ummul Firdaus. “Reform Regulation of Novum in Criminal Judges in an Effort To Provide Legal Certainty.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6, no. 2 (2021): 437–82. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.51371.

Saputra, Rian, Josef Purwadi Setiodjati, and Jaco Barkhuizen. “Under-Legislation in Electronic Trials and Renewing Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia (Comparison with United States).” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 8, no. 1 (2023): 243–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.67632.

Schneider, Anne. “Res Judicata in Criminal Matters and the European Courts - a Comparison Between Germany and Italy.” European Criminal Law Review : EuCLR 6, no. 2 (2016): 211–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2016-2-211.

Sinatrio, Wikan. “The Implementation of Diversion and Restorative Justice in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 4, no. 1 (2019): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i01.23339.

Siregar, Bismar. Keadilan Hukum dalam Berbagai Aspek Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1986.

Sulistyani, Wanodyo. “The Admissibility of Scientific Expert Evidence Under Indonesian Criminal Justice System.” Sriwijaya Law Review 3, no. 2 (2019): 152–61. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol3.iss2.215.pp152-161.

Sumardi, Dedy, Mukhsin Nyak Umar, Ruslan Sangaji, Firdaus M. Yunus, and Rahmatul Akbar. “Transition of Civil Law to Public Law: Integration of Modern Punishment Theory in Criminal Apostasy.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 22, no. 1 (2022): 237–62. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i1.26359.

Supriyadi, and Siti Suriyati. “Judges’ Legal Culture in Dealing with High Number of Applications for Child Marriage Dispensation during Covid-19 Pandemic at the Kudus Religious Court.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial 17, no. 1 (2022): 136–61. https://doi.org/10.19105/AL-LHKAM.V17I1.6060.

Tim Penyempurnaan Terjemahan al-Qur’an. Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya Edisi Penyempurnaan 2019. Jakarta: Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an, 2019.