Islamic Law at the Grassroot; SIGMA Program at Bhasa Radio Situbondo and Its Controversy
Abstract views: 505
,
PDF downloads: 314
Abstract
This study explores the controversy of SIGMA (Konsultasi Agama or Religious Consultation) at Bhasa Radio 93.1 FM Situbondo as the representation of how grassroots Muslims perceive Islamic law. SIGMA is an aired interactive forum discussing current issues of Islamic law engaging a host, a speaker, and listeners. However, it sparks controversy particularly because of the stigma of a liberalist. This research, therefore, focuses on the typology of SIGMA perspective through the opinion of its speakers, genealogy beyond their thought, and the controversy that comes along. As a qualitative field study with a socio-philosophical approach, it used interviews with 14 informants consisting of SIGMA speakers and staff as well as listeners from diverse backgrounds. It turns out that; firstly, SIGMA’s perspective indicates a progressive type of thought rather than liberal as stigmatized because of the employment of maqas{id al-syari’ah during discussing the issue and making decisions afterward. Secondly, the thinking model can be traced back historically to NU (Nahdlatul Ulama’) reformists who likely use maqas{id al-syari'ah to examine Islamic law along with a progressive mindset. SIGMA speakers furthermore tend to employ advancement of ijtihad and contextual fiqh like what bahs| al-masa'il forums typically do. Thirdly, the controversy stems mainly from the negative stigma which tends to be loudly and sporadically expressed making sympathetic voices unheard. This implies how grassroots Muslims interact with Islamic law in both textual and contextual realms particularly when coping with the changing situation and dynamic methodologies.
Downloads
References
Abd. Moqsith Ghazali. “Ijtihad Islam Liberal.” Jakarta: Jaringan Islam Liberal, 2005.
Al-Gazali. Al-Mustas{fa Min ‘Ilm Al-Us{ul. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr al-Mu’as{ir, 1413.
Al-Gazali. Al-Mankhul min Ta’liqat al-Us{ul. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1998.
Al-Isnawi, Jamal al-Din. Nihayah al-Sul Syarh Minhaj al-Wus{ul ila ‘Ilm al-Us{ul. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1993.
Al-Raisuni, Ahmad. Naz{ariyyat Al-Maqas{id Inda Al-Imam Al-Syat{ibi. Beirut: Muassasah al-Jami’ah, 1999.
Al-Syairazi, Abu Ish{aq Ibrahim bin Ali. Al-Luma’ Fi Us{ul Al-Fiqh. 2003: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 2003.
Arifin, Ahmad. “Pergulatan Pemikiran Fiqih ‘Tradisi’ Pola Mazhab.” Yogyakarta: elSAQ Press, 2010.
Aronson J. Inzlicht, & Mendoza-Denton, R. "On Being the Target of Prejudice: Education Implication", in Butera, F. & Levine, J. M. (Ed.), Coping with Minority Status: Responses to Exclusion and Inclusion. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Auda, Jasser. Maqashid Al-Syari’ah as Philosophy of Law: A Systems Approach. London, and Washington: The International Institutr of Islamic Thought, 2007.
Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Hukum Progresif Dari Satjipto Rahardjo.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 159–85. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185.
B. Major & O’Brien, L. T. The Social Psychology of Stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 2005.
Bakri, Asafri Jaya. Konsep Maqashid Syariah Menurut Al-Syatibi. Yogyakarta: Media Pratama, 2019.
Binder, Leonard. Islamic Liberation: A Critique of Development Ideologies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Duderija, Adis. The Imperatives of Progressive Islam. New York: Routlegde, 2017.
Esposito, J. L. “Rethinking Islam and Secularism,” 1998. http://www.thearda.com/rrh/papers/guidingpapers/Esposito.pdf.
Fahrudin. “Pentingnya Moderasi Beragama Bagi Penyuluh Agama.” Republika, 2019.
Husni, Zainul Mu’ien, Emilia Rosa, Lilik Handayani, and Dinda Febrianti Putri. “Analisis Status Anak Luar Kawin terhadap Orang Tuanya: Studi Komparatif Antara Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam.” HAKAM: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam 5, no. 1 (2021): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v5i1.2261.
Idrus, Muhammad. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2009.
Javaid, Saeed. Saeed Javaid, Islam and Modernization: A Comparative Analysis of Pakistan, Egypt and Turkey. Westport: Praeger Publisher, 1994.
Khadduri, Majid. "From Religion to National Law," in J. Thompson and R. Reischauer (Eds.), Modernization of the Arab World. New York: Van Nostrand, 1966.
Koentjaraningrat. Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: PT Gramedia, 1981.
Kurzman, Charles. Liberal Islam: A Sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
M. Arfan Mu’ammar, Abdul Wahid, et. al. Studi Islam Perspektif Insider/Outsider. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2013.
Madjid, Nurcholis. Islam, Kemodernan, dan Keindonesiaan. Bandung: PT. Mizan Pustaka, 1987.
Mahfudz, S. Nuansa Fiqh Sosial. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2012.
Mason-Whitehead, E. & Mason, ‘Stigma and Exclusion in Healthcare Setting,’ in Abrams, D., Christian, J. & Gordon, D. (Eds.). Multidisciplinary Handbook of Social Exclusion Research. England: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
Mufid, Moh. “Green Fatwas in Bahtsul Masail: Nahdlatul Ulamas Response to the Discourse of Environmental Crisis in Indonesia.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial 15, no. 2 (2020): 173–200. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v15i2.3956.
Mukhlis. “Metodologi Muslim Progresif dalam Memahami Pesan Sejati Al-Qur’an.” Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 11 (2011).
Nasution, Ade Iskandar. “Pendekatan Maqashid Al-Syari’Ah dalam Praktik Pembiayaan di Koperasi Peternak Sapi Bandung Utara (Kpsbu) Lembang.” Asy-Syari’ah 21, no. 1 (2019): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v21i1.4036.
Nasution, Khoiruddin. Pengantar Studi Islam. Yogyakarta: ACAdeMIA dan TAZZAFA, 2007.
Nawawi, Nawawi, Wawan Juandi, Maskuri Maskuri, R. Fakhrurrazi, and Djuwairiyah Djuwairiyah. “Moderation of Islam and Local Culture in Indonesia: An Argument of Islamic Law.” Jurnal Italienisch 12, no. 2 (2022): 744–52. https://www.italienisch.nl/index.php/VerlagSauerlander/article/view/400/364.
Nihaya, H M. “Tipologi Pemikiran Islam Indonesia Perspektif Nurcholish Madjid.” Sulesana 6, no. 1 (2012): 53–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1816.
Patoni, Achmad. Peran Kiai Pesantren Dalam Partai Politik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2007.
Rahman, Fazlur. Islam and Modernity. Chicago: Rahman, Islam and Modernity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Rahmatullah. “Islam Moderat Dalam Perdebatan.” Dialog : Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keagamaan 71, no. 1 (2011): 40–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v34i1.148.
Rohayana, Ade Dedi, and Muhammad Jauhari Sofi. “Critique of Radical Religious Paradigm: An Epistemological Analysis from Principles of Islamic Thought.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 11, no. 1 (2021): 163–84. https://doi.org/10.18326/IJIMS.V11I1.163-184.
Rusyd, Abu al-Walid Muh{ammad ibn Ahmad Ibn. Bidayah Al-Mujtahid wa Nihayat al-Muqtas{id. Kairo: Dar al-Hadith, 2004.
Saeed, Abdullah. Islamic Thought: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2006.
Sarifudin, Sarifudin. “Hukum Islam Progresif: Tawaran Teori Maslahat At-Thufi sebagai Epistemologi untuk Pembangunan Hukum Nasional di Indonesia.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 3, no. 2 (2019): 135. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i2.269.
Satjipto, Rahardjo dan. Hukum Progresif : Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia / Satjipto Rahardjo. Yogyakarta: Genta Pub, 2009.
Siradj, Said Agiel. Pesantren Masa Depan: Wacana Pemberdayaan dan Tranformasi Pesantren. Pustaka Hidayah: , 1999.
Tim. Karya Lengkap Nurcholish Madjid. Edited by Budhy Munawar-Rachman. Jakarta Selatan: Nurcholish Madjid Society (NCMS), 2019.
Wahyudi, Yudian. Maqashid Syari’ah dalam Pergumulan Politik. Yogyakarta: Nawesea, 2006.
Wood, Hannelie J. “Gender Inequality: The Problem of Harmful, Patriarchal, Traditional and Cultural Gender Practices in the Church.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 75, no. 1 (2019): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i1.5177.
Zahro, Ahmad. Lajnah Bahtsul Masail 1926-1999: Tradisi Intelektual NU. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2014.
Copyright (c) 2023 AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Publishing your paper with Al Ihkam (Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial/Journal of Law & Social Studies) means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper. Al Ihkam granted an exclusive non commercial reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis etc, so long as the use is not directed at commercial advantage or toward private monetary gain. The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by Al Ihkam in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at private monetary gain or commercial advantage.
Al Ihkam journal (Journal of Law & Social Studies) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge & be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
Al Ihkam journal Open Access articles are distributed under this Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). Articles can be read and shared for noncommercial purposes under the following conditions:
- BY: Attribution must be given to the original source (Attribution)
- NC: Works may not be used for commercial purposes (Noncommercial)
.png){kind=logo}
