Sextortion, Gender, and Digital Crime: A Socio-Legal Comparison between Positive and Islamic Law

  • JM. Muslimin Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta
  • Shubhan Shodiq Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Kamarusdiana Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta
  • Thamer Hamdi M. Almutairi Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
Abstract views: 353 , PDF downloads: 231
Keywords: Digital Sexual iolence; Sextortion; Positive Law; Islamic Law

Abstract

Digital sexual violence with the motive of extortion, known as sextortion, is one of the gender-based violence online types that is rampant in nowadays era of technology. The purpose of this study is to analyze (theoretically and empirically) the sextortion while offering progressive socio-legal interpretation solutions. This study is a normative and empirical legal research, employing statutory, case study, interviews, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), and fiqh approach. The data sources both primary and secondary, consist of legal materials, cases, real experiences, and sociological overviews on some relevant points. The data analysis technique used is content analysis, socio-legal explorations, and surveys, namely by examining documents in the form of legislation and related court decisions, expert judgments and empirical views of the purposive expert community. The results of the study show that positive law still has a dual attitude in which digital sexual violence with extortion motives is considered a crime on one hand but resulting in weak sanctions on another. Women are potentially oppressed and extorted, while their cultural defense mechanism is structurally weak.   Meanwhile, in Islamic law, sextortion can be categorized as a part of jarīmah (criminal act) with a punishment named ta’zīr, in which the government becomes the one who determines the type of punishment. A progressive socio-legal interpretation is therefore necessary for that specific type of crime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Nurah bintu. Ibtizāz Al-Fatayât: Ahkâmuhu Wa Uqûbatuhu Fî Fiqh Al-Islâmy. Riyadh: Kuliyyat al-Syari’ah Jâmi’ah al-Imam Muhammad bin Sa’ud al-Islamiyah, 2001.

Agustina, Shinta. “Implementasi Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 44, no. 4 (2015): 503. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.44.4.2015.503-510.

Al-Zubaidi, Muhammad Murtadho al-Husaini. Tâj Al- ’Arûs Min Jawâhir Al-Qâmûs. Kuwait: Maṭba’ah Hukûmah, 1988.

Bisri, Adib, and Munawwir Al-Bisri. Kamus Arab – Indonesia Indonesia – Arab. Surabaya: Pustaka progressif, 1999.

Carlton, Alessandra. “Sextortion: The Hybrid ‘Cyber-Sex’ Crime.” NCJL & Tech 21, no. 3 (2020): 177–213. https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncjolt/vol21/iss3/5.

Fiqri, Alfany Arga Alil, and Dwi Retno Widiyanti. “The Influence of Religiosity , Age , and Income on Willingness Volunteer for Indonesian Philanthropic Institutions.” Review of Islamic Economics and Finance 6, no. 2 (2023): 155–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/rief.v6i2.

Gulo, Nimerodi. “Disparitas dalam Penjatuhan Pidana.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 47, no. 3 (2018): 215. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.215-227.

Harisudin, M Noor. “Formulasi Baru Epistemologi Fiqh Perempuan.” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 10, no. 2 (2016): 393–408. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v10i2.735.

Huda, Muhammad Chairul, Yusriyadi, Mudjahirin Thohir, Miftahuddin, and Muhammad Nazil Iqdami. “Nonmarital Sex Rituals on Mount Kemukus (Study of Legal Culture and Islamic Law Perspective).” Samarah 6, no. 1 (2022): 289–309. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V6I1.9130.

Jordy Herry Christian. “Sekstorsi: Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Online dalam Paradigma Hukum Indonesia.” Binamulia Hukum 9, no. 1 (2023): 83–92. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v9i1.364.

Komnas Perempuan. “Bayang-Bayang Stagnansi: Daya Pencegahan dan Penanganan Berbanding Peningkatan Jumlah, Ragam dan Kompleksitas Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Terhadap Perempuan.” Komnas Perempuan, 2022. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/catatan-tahunan-detail/catahu-2022-bayang-bayang-stagnansi-daya-pencegahan-dan-penanganan-berbanding-peningkatan-jumlah-ragam-dan-kompleksitas-kekerasan-berbasis-gender-terhadap-perempuan.

———. “Perempuan dalam Himpitan Pandemi: Lonjakan Kekerasan Seksual, Kekerasan Siber, Perkawinan Anak dan Keterbatasan Penanganan di Tengah Covid-19.” Media Komnas Perempuan, 2021. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/catatan-tahunan-detail/catahu-2021-perempuan-dalam-himpitan-pandemi-lonjakan-kekerasan-seksual-kekerasan-siber-perkawinan-anak-dan-keterbatasan-penanganan-di-tengah-covid-19.

Kosim, Mohammad, Faqihul Muqoddam, and Faidol Mubarok. “Al-‘Unfu Fî Al-Tarbiyah Min Mandzûr Al-Tashrî’ Al-Indûnîsî Wa Al-Sharî’ah Al-Islâmiyah.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial 17, no. 2 (2022): 578–610. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.19105/al-Ihkam.v17i2.6170 Al-‘Unfu.

Kusuma, Ellen, and Justicia Avila Veda. (Diancam) Konten Intim Disebar, Aku Harus Bagaimana? SAFEnet dan Kolektif Advokat Untuk Keadilan Gender, 2020.

Marwah, Sitti. “Gender Progressive Teaching in Premarital Course Study on Islamic Marriage Guidance Books for Prospective Muslim Couples.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 15, no. 1 (2022): 103–26. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2022.15106.

Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira. “The Conundrum of Intestate Succession for Muslims in Uganda: Qadhis Court, Women’s Rights, and Islamic Inheritance Law Issues.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 16, no. 1 (2023): 43–68. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2023.16103.

Munawwir, Ahmad Warson. Kamus Al Munawwir: Arab Indonesia Terlengkap, Cet Ke-25. Surabaya: Pustaka progressif, 2002.

Muthalib, Salman Abdul, Tarmizi M. Jakfar, Muhammad Maulana, and Lukman Hakim. “Changes in Congregational Prayer Practices During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Aceh from Maqashid Al-Sharia Perspective.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial 16, no. 2 (2021): 421–49. https://doi.org/10.19105/AL-LHKAM.V16I2.5250.

Natali, Kimberly. “Bisakah Hukum di Indonesia Memberikan Perlindungan Bagi Korban Revenge Porn?” Kumparan, Accessed January 24, 2022. https://kumparan.com/kimberlynataliboas/bisakah-hukum-di-indonesia-memberikan-perlindungan-bagi-korban-revenge-porn-1zPFmv2WGng.

Nendensan. “Mengenal Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Online.” Medium, Accessed on May 30, 2021. https://nendensan.medium.com/mengenal-kekerasan-berbasis-gender-online-kbgo-a4ec1bd95632.

O’Malley, Roberta Liggett, and Karen M. Holt. “Cyber Sextortion: An Exploratory Analysis of Different Perpetrators Engaging in a Similar Crime.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37, no. 1–2 (2022): 258–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520909186.

Patchin, Justin W., and Sameer Hinduja. “Sextortion Among Adolescents: Results From a National Survey of U.S. Youth.” Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment 32, no. 1 (2020): 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218800469.

Permana, Fikri Chandra. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku ‘Sekstorsi’ dalam Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Online (KBGO).” Jurist-Diction 5, no. 3 (2022): 883–98. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i3.35776.

Rizki, Julastri Dwi, and Devi Yulida. “Penerapan Hukum Menggunakan Metode Ekstensif Konstruktif Hukum Kepada Pelaku Kejahatan Sextortion.” Al-Hakam Islamic Law & Contemporary Issues 1, no. 1 (2020): 7–10. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/ilj/article/view/7515/3862.

Rochaeti, Nur, Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo, Umi Rozah, and Jihyun Park. “A Restorative Justice System in Indonesia: A Close View from the Indigenous Peoples’ Practices.” Sriwijaya Law Review 7, no. 1 (2023): 87–104. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1919.pp87-104.

Saad, Yasmin. “Apa Hukuman Pemerasan Elektronik dalam Hukum Mesir?” Shorouk News, 2021. https://www.shorouknews.com/news/view.aspx?cdate=01122021&id=b63927b8-4aef-4f19-8717-7cbf6552db7b.

Syamsuddin, A. B., Syam’un Syam’un, Muh Ilham, Usman Jasad, and Idris Rasyid. “Parenting Children in A Religious Perspective of Fishermen’s Families In Sinjai, Indonesia: Structural Functionalism Approach.” Samarah 8, no. 1 (2024): 257–80. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.17854.

Taufiki, Muhammad, Universitas Islam, and Negeri Syarif. “The Use of Maxims (Al-Qawāʿid Al-Uṣūliyyah Wa Al-Fiqhiyyah) in Legal Argumentation of Sharia Economic Court Decisions in Indonesia.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial 17, no. 1 (2022): 165–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v17i1.6070.

Yuningsih, Henny, I. Nyoman Nurjaya, Prija Djatmika, and Masruchin Ruba’I. “Ratio Legis of Chemical Castration to the Perpetrators of Sexual Violence against Children.” Sriwijaya Law Review 4, no. 2 (2020): 285–303. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol4.Iss2.432.pp285-303.

Published
2024-06-15
Section
Articles