Intelligence Concept: A Cross-cultural Study of University Students from The Javanese and Madurese in East Java
Abstract views: 528
,
PDF downloads: 379
Abstract
Intelligence is often used as a benchmark to predict someone's success in the future. Therefore, intelligence is also often used as a reason for someone to label individuals who do not have the abilities that others want. Students of education faculty as prospective educators in the future have a fairly central role in providing understanding about the intelligence that students have to the parents, senior teachers, and students themselves. Before becoming an educator, education students are expected to have a good concept of intelligence so that the understanding given can be done precisely. This study aims to reveal the concepts of intelligence subjectively to the students of prospective educators from the Javanese and Madurese. The study used a qualitative research approach with a case study model that emphasized the exploration of a system that intertwined with each other. The results showed that education students who originated from Javanese and Madurese have a very diverse concept of intelligence. Despite the diverse concept of intelligence, the concept of the student intelligence of both tribes has a relation that complements each other. Students of both tribes also have the view that each individual has different intelligence. Therefore, most of the students from both tribes have been in line with Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory. The findings in this study are that interpersonal intelligence is considered to be the most prominent by the Madurese people, because the ability to connect with others is very high.
Downloads
References
Adcock, Phyllis K. “The Longevity of Multiple Intelligence Theory in Education.” Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin 80, no. 4 (2014): 50-57. https://www.proquest.com/openview/511b4473e7ad2fb644da a644289bdf5b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=47978.
Afif, Ahmad, and Fajriani Kaharuddin. “Perilaku Belajar Peserta Didik Ditinjau Dari Pola Asuh Otoriter Orangtua.” Auladuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam 2, no. 2 (2015): 287–300. http://journal. uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/auladuna/article/view/883.
Anastasi, Anne, and Susana Urbina. Psychological Testing. Seventh Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc., 1997.
Azwar, Saifuddin. Pengantar Psikologi Inteligensi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2011.
Barrington, E. “Teaching to Student Diversity in Higher Education: How Multiple Intelligence Theory Can Help.” Teaching in Higher Education 9, no. 4 (2004): 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1356251042000252363.
BPS JawaTimur. “Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) Jawa Timur Tahun 2018,” 2019.
Chairani, Mustika, Ida Wiendijarti, and Dewi Novianti. “Komunikasi Interpersonal Guru Dan Orang Tua Dalam Mencegah Kenakalan Remaja Pada Siswa (Studi Deskriptif Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA Kolombo Sleman).” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 7, no. 2 (2009): 143-52. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v7i2.17.
Chatib, M. Orang Tuanya Manusia: Melejitkan Potensi Dan Kecerdasan Dengan Menghargai Fitrah Setiap Anak. Bandung: Kaifa, 2014.
Covey, Stephen R. The 8th Habit: From Effectiveness to Greatness. New York: Free Press, 2004.
Creswell, JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2013.
Damanik, Caroline. “Siswi SMP Bunuh Diri, Diduga Karena Khawatir Tak Bisa Masuk SMA Favorit.” Kompas, June 2, 2018. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/06/02/15540631/siswi-smp-bunuh-diri-diduga-karena-khawatir-tak-bisa-masuk-sma-favorit.
Eminita, Viarti, and Arlin Astriyani. “Persepsi Orang Tua Terhadap Kecerdasan Majemuk Anak.” Fibonacci: Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika 4, no. 1 (2018): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24853/ fbc.4.1.1-16
Gardner, H. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 2011.
Gardner, Howard. Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice A Reader. New York: Basic Books, 1993.
Goleman, D. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books, 1995.
Gregory, Robert J. Tes Psikologi: Sejarah Prinsip dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2014.
Hanurawan, Fattah. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Untuk Ilmu Psikologi. Surabaya: KPKM Universitas Airlangga, 2012.
Herdiansyah, Haris. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu Psikologi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2015.
Hidayat, Ainurrahman. “Jatidiri Orang Madura (Vis a Vis) Industrialisasi.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 16, no. 2 (2009): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v16i2.105.
Hidayat, Ainurrahman. “Karakter Orang Madura dan Falsafah Politik Lokal.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 15, no. 1 (2009): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v15i1.109.
Imron. “Ganti Rugi Lahan Murah, Warga Madura Tolak Program BPWS,” 2020. https://portalmadura.com/ganti-rugi-lahan-murah-warga-madura-tolak-program-bpws-223014/.
Kabar Madura. “Warga Labang Tolak Pembangunan Wisata KKSJM.” 2020. https://kabarmadura.id/warga-labang-tolak-pembangunan-wisata-kksjm/.
Koran Madura. “BPN Bangkalan dan BPWS ‘Merayu’, Warga Tetap Tolak Pembebasan Lahan di Dusun Sekarbunguh.” 2019. https://www.koranmadura.com/2019/08/bpn-bangkalan-dan-bpws-merayu-warga-tetap-tolak-pembebasan-lahan-di-dusun-sekarbunguh/.
Kushendar, and Aprezo Pardodi Maba. “Bahaya Label Negatif Terhadap Pembentukan Konsep Diri Anak Dengan Gangguan Belajar.” Nidhomul Haq 2, no. 3 (2017): 106–13. https://doi.org/ 10.31538/ndh.v2i3.27.
Miles, M.B., A.M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. USA: Sage Publications, 2014.
Nugrahaeni, Sri Devi Eka, Sidik Permana, Rahma Sayyida Hilmia, and Mela Darmayanti. “Fenomena Labelling dan Self-Concept Siswa.” Edutech 18, no. 3 (2019): 277–88. https://ejournal.upi. edu/index.php/edutech/article/view/17546.
Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2307/330063.
Purwanto. “Intelegensi: Konsep dan Pengukurannya.” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 1, no. 4 (2010): 477-85. https://doi. org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i4.479.
Qamariah, Isti, La Ode Jumaidin, and Sutiyana Fachruddin. “Budaya Komunikasi Etnis Madura dalam Kehidupan Sosial Kelurahan Mata Kota Kendari.” Jurnal Penelitian Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi dan Informasi 1, no. 2 (2016): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.52423/ jikuho.v1i2.1429.
Rahardjo, Mudjia. “Triangulasi dalam Penelitian Kualitatif.” UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2010. https://www.uin-malang.ac.id/r/101001/triangulasi-dalam-penelitian-kualitatif.html.
Rahmah, S. “Teori Kecerdasan Majemuk Howard Gardner dan Pengembangannya pada Metode Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Untuk Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 5, no. 1 (2008):89-110. http://digilib. uinsuka.ac.id/8759/1/SITI%20RAHMAH%20TEORIKECERDASAN%20MAJEMUKHOWARD%20GARDNER%20DAN%20PENGEMBANGANNYA%20PADA%20METODE%20PEMBELAJARAN%20PENDIDIKAN%20AGAMA%20ISLAM%20UNTUK%20ANAK%20USIA%20SEKOLAH%20DASAR.pdf.
Ramadhani, Rio. “Komunikasi Interpersonal Orang Tua Dan Anak dalam Membentuk Perilaku Positif Anak Pada Murid di SDIT Cordova Samarinda.” EJournal Ilmu Komunikasi 1, no. 3 (2013): 112–21. https://ejournal.ilkom.fisip-unmul.ac.id/site/?p=865.
Rini, Yohana Susetyo. “Komunikasi Orangtua-Anak Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Pendidikan.” Jurnal Interaksi 3, no. 2 (2014): 112–22. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi/ article/viewFile/8777/7103.
Santrock, John W. Life-Span Development (13th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 2017.
Scheid, T. L., and E.R. Wright, eds. A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health: Social Contexts, Theories, and Systems (3rd ed.). Boston: Cambridge University Press, 2017. https://psycnet.apa.org/ record/2017-30381-000.
Shiraev, Eric B., and David A. Levy. Cross-Cultural Psychology: Critical Thinking and Contemporary Applications. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2010. http://www.umpalangkaraya.ac.id/dosen/dwisariusop/wpcontent/uploads/2016/11/Cross_Cultural_Psychology_Critical_Thinking_and_Contemporary_Applications_Fourth_Edition.pdf.
Sukmadinata, and Nana Syaodih. Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2003.
Taufik, Miskudin. “Pintar dan Cerdas Itu Beda.” Inspektorat Jenderal Kemendikbud, 2019. https://itjen.kemdikbud.go.id/public/post/ detail/pintar-dan-cerdas-itu-beda.
Timmins, Ami C. Brualdi. “Multiple Intelligences: Gardner’s Theory.” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 5, no. 10 (1996): 1–3. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol5/iss1/10.
Widiana, Siwi Herlina. “Landasan Konseptual Teoritik Psikologik Dari Berbagai Teori Inteligensi.” Humanitas (Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia) 6, no. 1 (2009): 56-73. https://docplayer.info/ 93995925-Landasan-konseptual-teoritik-psikologik-dari-berbagai-teori-inteligensi.html.
Woolfolk, Anita E, and Lorraine McCune Nicolich. Educational Psychology for Teachers. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc, 1984.
Zohar, Danah, and Ian Marshall. Spiritual Capital: Wealth We Can Live By. California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2004.
The journal operates an Open Access policy under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial Share-Alike license. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
