Does Proficiency Level Affect Learners’ Lexical Access in L1 and L2?

Abstract views: 97 , PDF downloads: 60
Keywords: Lexical access, Proficiency level

Abstract

Proficiency level is one important factor that contributes to learners’ language performance. Learners with higher proficiency levels tend to perform lexical access better and faster than those with lower proficiency. This study aims to investigate whether proficiency level affects lexical access in L1 and L2. The research involved seven Indonesian university students of master’s and doctoral degree programs at a university in the Netherlands who possess different proficiency levels. Two scrambled texts in the participants’ L1 and L2 were employed to test the participants. Meanwhile, the paired-samples t-test and correlation analysis were used to report the experiment. The results revealed an insignificant difference and a negative correlation between proficiency level and the number of errors and reading time. However, on average, the more proficient learners outperformed the less proficient, thus indicating that they may possess more complex lexical access in L1 and L2. Further studies are needed to provide other useful insights on this topic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boddaert, G., C. Cornut, and S. Casalis. “Integration of Newly Learned L2 Words into the Mental Lexicon is Modulated by Vocabulary Learning Method.” Acta Psychologica 212 (2021): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103220.

Bot, Kees De, Wander Lowie, and Marjolyn Verspoor. Second Language Acquisition: An Advanced Resource Book. Routledge: Psychology Press, 2005.

Crossley, Scott A., Kristopher Kyle, Laura K. Allen, Liang Guo, and Danielle S. McNamara. “Linguistic Microfeatures to Predict L2 Writing Proficiency: A Case Study in Automated Writing Evaluation.” The Journal of Writing Assessment 7, no. 1 (2014): 1–34.

Crossley, Scott A., Tom Salsbury, and Danielle S. Mcnamara. “Assessing Lexical Proficiency Using Analytic Ratings: A Case for Collocation Accuracy.” Applied Linguistics 36, no. 5 (2015): 570–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt056.

Dixon, Peter, and Ernst Z. Rothkopf. “Word Repetition, Lexical Access, and the Process of Searching Words and Sentences.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, no. 5 (1979): 629–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90354-2.

Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni, and Nicola Molinaro. “The Wide-Open Doors to Lexical Access.” Frontiers in Psychology 4 (2013): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00471.

Field, J. “Lexical Storage and Lexical Access.” In Psycholinguistics: A Resource Book for Students, 15–17. New York: Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, 2013.

Grosjean, François. “Studying Bilinguals: Methodological and Conceptual Issues.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1, no. 2 (1998): 131–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672899800025X.

Jiang, Nan, and Kenneth I. Forster. “Cross-Language Priming Asymmetries in Lexical Decision and Episodic Recognition.” Journal of Memory and Language 44, no. 1 (2001): 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2737.

Kannan, Sundarachariar and Kavitha.V. “A Comprehensive Overview of Bilingual Mental Lexicon and Vocabulary Learning: A Psycholinguistic Approach in Language Pedagogy.” IJELLS 4, no. 1 (2015): 121–25.

Kastenbaum, Jessica G., Lisa M. Bedore, Elizabeth D. Peña, Li Sheng, Ilknur Mavis, Rajani Sebastian-Vaytadden, Grama Rangamani, Sofia Vallila-Rohter, and Swathi Kiran. “The Influence of Proficiency and Language Combination on Bilingual Lexical Access.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22, no. 2 (2019): 300–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000366.

Kroll, J. F., and A. Dijkstra. “The Bilingual Lexicon.” In Handbook of Applied Linguistics, by R. Kaplan, 301–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Lengyel, Zsolt, and Judit Navracsics. Second Language Lexical Processes. Second Language Lexical Processes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2007. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.21832/9781853599682/html.

Maera, Paul. Connected Words: Word Associations and Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing, 2009.

McClelland, James L., and David E. Rumelhart. "An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: I. An Account of Basic Findings." Psychological Review 88, no. 5 (1981): 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375.

Md Zolkapli, Rasyiqah Batrisya, and Khazriyati Salehuddin. “Lexical Access Patterns of Second Language Speakers of English.” Gema Online Journal of Language Studies 19, no. 4 (2019): 48–65. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1904-03.

Persici, Valentina, Marilyn Vihman, Roberto Burro, and Marinella Majorano. "Lexical Access and Competition in Bilingual Children: The Role of Proficiency and the Lexical Similarity of the Two Languages." Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 179 (2019): 103–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.10.002.

Singleton, David. Exploring the Second Language Mental Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Vögelin, Cristina, Thorben Jansen, Stefan D. Keller, Nils Machts, and Jens Möller. “The Influence of Lexical Features on Teacher Judgements of ESL Argumentative.” Assessing Writing 39 (2019): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003.

Weinreich, Uriel. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2010.

Yu, Guoxing. “Lexical Diversity in Writing and Speaking Task Performances.” Applied Linguistics 31, no. 2 (2010): 236–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp024.

Published
2021-05-31