Binā al-Jumal al-Mu’aqqodah fī Riwayah “Mā Lā Nabūh Bih” ala Asāsi Nadhariyyati Tagmemic Kenneth L. Pike [Complex Sentence Construction in Novel “Mā Lā Nabūh Bih” Based on the Perspective of Kenneth L. Pike’s Tagmemic]

  • Abdul Basid Arabic Language and Literature Study Program, Faculty of Humanity, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Malang 65145 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9919-421X
  • Hanna Izzah Syafina Arabic Language and Literature Study Program, Faculty of Humanity, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Malang 65145
  • Husnizan Hayati Arabic Language and Literature Study Program, Faculty of Humanity, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Malang 65145
  • Husni Nazir Ushul Fiqh Study Program, Faculty of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11751
  • Fakhrur Razi Arabic Language and Literature Study Program, Faculty of Arabic Language, Institute for Arabic Research and Study (ALESCO), Cairo 11519 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-8577
Abstract views: 766 , PDF (ARABIC) downloads: 502
Keywords: Complex sentence, Novel, Sentence construction, Tagmemic theory

Abstract

Sentence studies that are rarely discussed in the realm of linguistics are complex sentences. This article aims to describe the construction and types of complex sentences based on their clause formation in the novel Mā Lā Nabūh Bih based on Kenneth L. Pike's Tagmemic theory. This research was a qualitative and descriptive study, with the primary data source were the novel Mā Lā Nabūh Bih by Sandra Serag. Each type of complex sentence was selected and described according to Tagmemic theory. The results of this study found that four ‘harf’ functions were used as subordinating conjunctions based on the formation of the clauses, which consists of the arrangement of musnad (subject), musnad ilaih (predicate), and maf'ul bih (object). The distinguishes among four ‘harf’ functions are in the form and position of the subordinating conjunctions that separate the main sentence and its subordinate clauses, namely time relations (mundzu/since), causal relationship (lianna/because), complementary relationships (anna/really), comparative relationship (kaanna/as if). Complex sentences in the Tagmemic perspective are more complex than other types of sentence structures since they may consist of two slots, two classes, two roles, or two cohesions. In contrast, other sentence structure types have only one slot, class, role, and cohesion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Khuli, Muhammad Ali. A Dictionary of Theoretical Linguistics. Beirut: Libraric Du Liban, 1982.

Basid, Abdul, and Husnawati Zahrah. “Klausa Independen dalam Novel Tukar Takdir Karya Valiant Budi Berdasarkan Perspektif Tagmemik Kenneth L. Pike.” In Linguistik Modern: Tagmemik dan Struktural, edited by Abdul Basid, 3. Malang: Edulitera, 2020.

Becker, A. L. “A Tagmemic Approach to Paragraph Analysis.” College Composition and Communication 16, no. 5 (1965): 237-242. https://doi.org/10.2307/355200.

Blansitt, Edward L. Jr, Ralph W. Jr. Ewton, and Jacot Ornstein. “Phonology, Grammar, and Semology.” In Studies in Language and Linguistics, 17–32. Texas: University of Texas, 1969.

Cook, Walter A., and John T. Platt. “The Tagmemic-Case Grammar Model.” American Speech 45, no. 3/4 (1970): 262-277. https://doi.org/10.2307/454843.

Dalbor, John B. “A Simplified Tagmemic Approach for Teaching Spanish Syntax.” Hispania 55, no. 3 (1972): 490–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/339315.

Ekowardono, B. Karno. “Kalimat Dasar Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Tentang Ciri dan Tipenya.” In Telaah Bahasa dan Sastra, edited by Hasan Alwi and Dendy Sugono. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, 2002.

Eriyanti, Ribut Wahyu, Kartika Tiara Syarifuddin, Kasem Datoh, and Eka Yuliana. Linguistik Umum. Jawa Timur: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia, 2020.

Fadly, Ahmad. Bahasa Indonesia Akademis (Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia). Aceh: Siah Kuala University Press, 2021.

Firdausah, Isyqie. “Tata Bahasa Hadis dalam al-’Arba’in an-Nawawiyyah (Studi Analisis Tagmemik).” Master Thesis, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2016.

Frank, Marcella. Modern English: A Practical Reference Guide. New York: Prentice Hall, 1972.

Franklin, Karl J. “Tagmemics and Tagmemic Rules.” Linguistics 9, no. 70 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1971.9.70.25.

Glass, Amee, and Dorothy Hackett. “Pitjantjara Grammar: A Tagmemic View of the Ngaanyatjara (Warburton Ranges) Dialect.” American Anthropologist 74, no. 4 (1972): 931–32. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1972.74.4.02a00810.

Hairu Firdaus, Cahyo Yusuf, and Asri Wijayanti. “Kalimat Kompleks Parataktik dan Hipotaktik serta Formulasi Materi Ajarnya.” Repetisi: Riset Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2019): 53–64.

Hassan, Nagham Ali. “Tagmemic Analysis of English and Arabic Praise Poetry: A Contrastive Study.” Journal of College of Education for Woman 28, no. 5 (2017): 143–248.

Hasyim, Muhammad. “Konstruksi Sintaksis dalam Novel Bumi Cinta Karya Habiburrahman EL Shirazy Berdasarkan Perspektif Tagmemik Kenneth L. Pike.” In Linguistik Modern: Tagmemik dan Struktural, edited by Abdul Basid, 119. Malang: Edulitera, 2020.

Ibrahim, Riyadh K., and Rabab H.Shghedl. “A News Story from a Tagmemic Perspective.” Al-Adab Journal, no. 81 (2007): 1–17.

Indriastuti, M. H. Anik M. Buku Pintar Tenses. Jakarta Selatan: Wahyu Media, 2009.

Jaeni, Muhamad. “A Comparative Study of Ngapsahi Analysis and Tagmemic Analysis on Arabic Texts in Kitab Kuning.” ALSINATUNA 4, no. 1 (2018): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.28918/alsinatuna.v4i1.1590.

Johnson, Linda K., and Richard L. Bayless. “The Referential Hierarchy: Theoritical Concepts from A Tagmemic Perspective.” Folia Linguistica 10, no. 3–4 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1977.10.3-4.289.22

Kashimi, Mien, and Siwi Kadarmo. Modul English Grammar: Metode Terbaik Menguasai Tata Bahasa Inggris Lisan dan Tertulis. Jakarta: Cmedia Imprint Kawan Pustaka, 2017.

Kinney, James. “Tagmemic Rhetoric: A Reconsideration.” College Composition and Communication 29, no. 2 (1978): 141-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/357298.

Klammer, Thomas P., Muriel R. Schulz, and Angela Della Volpe. Analyzing English Grammar. United States: Pearson Longman, 2007.

Kneupper, Charles W. “Revising the Tagmemic Heuristic: Theoretical and Pedagogical Considerations.” College Composition and Communication 31, no. 2 (1980): 160-168. https://doi.org/10.2307/356370.

Kumalasari, Ratih, Dawud Dawud, and Sunaryo Sunaryo. “Wujud Kalimat Kompleks dalam Karangan Cerita Fantasi Siswa SMP Kelas VII.” Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan 2, no. 8 (2017): 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i8.9850.

Longacre, Robert E. “Some Fundamental Insights of Tagmemics.” Language 41, no. 1 (1965): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/411852.

Longacre, Robert E. “Transformational Parameters in Tagmemic Field Structures.” In Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics, edited by Charles W. Kreidler, 18th ed. Washington: Geogetown University Press, 1965.

Mahajani, Tri, Suhendra, Ekowati Ainiyah, Talitha Stella, and Mukhtar Ruyatul Hilal. Sintaksis Bahasa Indonesia. Bogor: Lindan Bestari, 2021.

Odell, Lee. “Another Look at Tagmemic Theory: A Response to James Kinney.” College Composition and Communication 29, no. 2 (1978): 146–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/357299.

Poythress, Vern. “A Simple Traffic-Light Semiotic Model for Tagmemic Theory.” Semiotica 2018, no. 225 (2018): 253–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0025.

Poythress, Vern S. “Tagmemic Analysis of Elementary Algebra.” Semiotica 17, no. 2 (1976): 131-151. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1976.17.2.131.

Poythress, Vern S. “Thirteen-Box Tagmemic Theory as a Method for Displaying Semi-Independent Language Variables.” Studies in Language 2, no. 1 (1978): 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.2.1.04poy.

Safitri, Rien Helda, Patriantoro, and Amriani Amir. “Analisis Tagmemik Kalimat Tunggal dalam Kumpulan Cerpen Senyum Karyamin Karya Ahmad Tohari.” JPPK: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa 8, no. 2 (2019): 1–10.

Sasangka, Sry Satriya Tjatur. Seri Penyuluhan Bahasa Indonesia: Kalimat. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2015.

Serag, Sandra. Mā Lā Nabūh Bih. Qohiroh: Dar Dun, 2018.

Soeparno. Aliran Tagmemik. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Jogja, 2008.

Soeparno. Dasar-Dasar Linguistik Umum. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Jogja, 2002.

Susiawati, Wati. Al-Jurjani Versus Chomsky. Jakarta: Publica Institute Jalarta, 2020.

Vitanza, Victor J. “A Tagmemic Heuristic for the Whole Composition.” College Composition and Communication 30, no. 3 (1979): 270–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/356393.

Published
2022-11-09
How to Cite
Basid, A., Syafina, H. I., Hayati, H., Nazir, H., & Razi, F. (2022). Binā al-Jumal al-Mu’aqqodah fī Riwayah “Mā Lā Nabūh Bih” ala Asāsi Nadhariyyati Tagmemic Kenneth L. Pike [Complex Sentence Construction in Novel “Mā Lā Nabūh Bih” Based on the Perspective of Kenneth L. Pike’s Tagmemic]. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 16(2), 214-244. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v16i2.6024