Indonesian EFL Students’ Perceptions on Learning Autonomy in Online Learning Delivery Mode

  • Dalilan Dalilan Faculty of Adab and Humanity, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia
Abstract views: 248 , PDF downloads: 208
Keywords: Perception, Learning Autonomy, Online Learning


The online learning delivery method is increasingly used in the teaching and learning process at universities. This type of learning is relatively new to students, in particular to Indonesian EFL students. Students' learning autonomy in an online learning system is inevitably required. Autonomy in online learning and in offline learning can be differently perceived by the students. This study aimed at revealing EFL students' perception on learning autonomy in an online learning method. A questionnaire was used as the single instrument to obtain data from 35 students of the English Education Study Program of Tarbiyah and Teacher Education Faculty, State Islamic University Raden Fatah Palembang. The study sample was selected using opportunity sampling, and data were analyzed using a simple percentage statistic formula. The study results indicated that the majority of the students perceive online learning as independent learning in which they must have self-learning awareness and motivation, self-learning responsibility, and self-directed and governed learning. They also perceived that they could develop the problem-solving ability, critical thinking, and learning initiative in autonomous online learning. In the context of learning independently in an online learning system, self-time management is also essential to support their learning optimally.


Download data is not yet available.


Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of Educational Theory for Online Learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca: Athabasca University.

Bakia, M., Shear, L., Toyama, Y., & Lassete, A. (2012). Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity. Center for Technology in Learning SRI International.

Baliyan, S., & Moorad, F. (2018). Teaching Effectiveness in Private Higher Education Institutions in Botswana: Analysis of Students’ Perceptions. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(3), 143–155.

Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and Researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning. London: Pearson Education.

Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. London: Longman.

Binn, K. (2020). The Benefits of Autonomous Learning.

Bravo, J. C. (2017). Motivation and Autonomy in Learning English as Foreign Language: A Case Study of Ecuadorian College Students. English Language Teaching, 10(2. 10.5539/elt.v10n2p100

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. (2015). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies & Academic Achievement in Online Higher Education Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dornyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. London: Routledge.

Gottardi, M. de L. (2015). Autonomy in the Learning Process at a Distance: The Competence to be Developed by the Student. Associação Brasileira de Educação a Distância, 14, 108–110.

Khan, M. A., Vivek, V., Nabi, M. K., Khojah, M., & Tahir, M. (2020). Students’ Perception towards E-Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in India: An Empirical Study. Sustainability, 13(1), 1–14.

Khotimah, K., Widiati, U., Mustofa, M., & Ubaidillah, M. F. (2019). Autonomous English learning: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 371–381.

Lee, E., Pate, J. A., & Cozart, D. (2015). Autonomy Support for Online Students. TechTrends, 59(4), 54–61.

Lengkanawati, N. S. (2017). Learner Autonomy in The Indonesian EFL Settings. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 6 No. 2, 222–231.

Liu, H. ju. (2015). Learner Autonomy: The Role of Motivation in Foreign Language Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 6, No. 6, 1165–1174.

McDonald, S. M. (2012). Perception: A Concept Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 23(1), 2–9.

Najeeb, S. (2013). Learner Autonomy in Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1238–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.183

Padmo, D., Belawati, T., Idrus, O., & Ardiasih, L. S. (2017). The State of Practice of Mobile Learning in Universitas Terbuka Indonesia. In A. Murphy, H. Farley, L. E. Dyson, & H. Jones (Eds.), Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region 40, 173–190. Springer Singapore.

Purwadi, Saputra*, W. N. E., Wahyudi, A., Supriyanto, A., Muyana, S., Rohmadheny, P. S., … Kurniawan, S. J. (2021). Student Perceptions of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: A Study of Phenomenology. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1515–1528.

Simmons, D. E. (2012). The Forum Report: E-Learning Adoption Rates and Barriers. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Song, L., & Hill, J. (2007). A Conceptual Model for Understanding Self-Directed Learning in Online Environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27–42.

Stack, S. (2015). Learning Outcomes in an Online vs. Traditional Course. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–18.

Wojciechowska, A. T. (2015). The Use of the Internet in Developing Learner’s Autonomy. World Scientific News, 8, 54–81.

Tuchfah, F. N. (2019). Teachers’ and Students’ Perception of Learner Autonomy in Language Learning at SMAN I Gedangan Sidoarjo [Undergraduate Thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya].

Ustunluaglu, E. (2009). Autonomy in Language Learning: Do Students Take Responsibility for Their Learning? Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5 (2), 148–169.

Walter, E., & Woodford, K. (2010). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

How to Cite
Dalilan, D. (2021). Indonesian EFL Students’ Perceptions on Learning Autonomy in Online Learning Delivery Mode. PANYONARA: Journal of English Education, 3(2), 122-134.