The Ordering Distribution and Competing Motivation of Evidential and Logical Causal Clauses in English and Chinese
Abstract views: 52
,
PDF downloads: 39
Abstract
The ordering distribution of causal adverbial clauses in English and Chinese differs due to distinct factors, with English clauses tending to appear finally and Chinese clauses initially. This study aims to analyze the ordering distribution of logical and evidential causal clauses in English and Chinese using Diessel's competing motivation model, investigating the interplay of semantic forces, syntactic processing, and discourse pragmatics. A corpus-based analysis was conducted on 800 sentences from the British National Corpus and the Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese, focusing on four causal subordinators in each language. The results reveal a clear cross-linguistic distinction: In Chinese, evidential causal clauses occur initially at 82.5%, driven by iconicity and discourse coherence, while logical causal clauses show a lower initial occurrence rate of 67.3%. Conversely, English causal clauses tend to occur in final positions, with evidential clauses at 91.66% and logical clauses at 84.2%, due to the relative semantic independence, functioning as independent processing units. The ordering distribution reflects competing motivations: Chinese prioritizes iconicity and discourse coherence, while English emphasizes syntactic independence and processing ease. The study provides new insights into the interaction of semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic forces in shaping clause positioning across languages.
Downloads
References
Abraham, E. (1991). Why ‘Because’? The Management of Given/New Information as a Constraint on the Selection of Causal Alternatives. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 11(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1991.11.3.323
Ai, Y & Jin, L. (2020). Ordering Distributions of Main and Adverbial Clauses in English and Chinese: A Contrastive Study. Journal of Foreign Languages, 43(4), 53–64. https://jfl.shisu.edu.cn/en/article/id/481
Baoyi, N. (2006). A Study of English Cause-Effect Complex Sentences from the Perspective of Cognitive Grammar. Modern Foreign Languages, 436(4), 338–345.
Dancygier, B. (1998). Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge, and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, H. (1996). Processing Factors of Pre- and Postposed Adverbial Clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 22(1), 71–82. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/bls/
Diessel, H. (2001). The Ordering Distribution of Main and Adverbial Clauses: A Typological Study. Language, 7(3), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0152
Diessel, H. (2005). Competing Motivations for the Ordering of Main and Adverbial Clauses. In Linguistics (Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 449–470). Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.449
Diessel, H. (2008). Iconicity of Sequence: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Positioning of Temporal Adverbial Clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.018
Diessel, H. &Hetterle, K. (2011). Causal Clauses: A Cross-linguistic Investigation of Their Structure, Meaning, and Use. In Peter Siemund (Ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Variation (pp. 23–54). Mouton de Gruyte. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4200.8968
Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. Universals of Language.
Hui, K. & J. X. (2022). Prototypical Correspondence of the Use of Subordinations and Causal Relationships by Chinese EFL Learners. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 54(5), 703–715. https://doi.org/10.19923/j.cnki.fltr.2022.05.014
Jiaxuan, S. (1993). A Survey of Studies of Iconicity in Syntax. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 80(1), 2–8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43135259
Keding, Z. (2023). The Causal Coordinate Construction in English: Formation Conditions, Cognitive and Pragmatic Motivations. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 958(6), 803–813. https://doi.org/10.19923/j.cnki.fltr.2023.06.002
Kirkpatrick, A. (1993). Information Sequencing in Modern Standard Chinese in a Genre of Extended Spoken Discourse. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 13(3), 423–453. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1993.13.3.423
Linlan, G. (2018). A Corpus-Based Comparative Study of Word Order in English and Chinese Adverbial Clauses of Reason. English Teacher, 20, 64–66. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-7905
Lixin, J. (2016). Typological Evidence of Mixed Word Orders in Mandarin and Its Motivation. Chinese Language Learning, 155(3), 3–11.
Qi, W.& Wei, Z. (2023). The Impact of Preferences on Structural Priming in L2 Coherent Discourse: An Examination of Sequence of English Adverbial Clauses. Foreign Language World, 63(6), 64–71.
Qiaoyun, L. (2004). A Preliminary Study of Evidential Causals in English. Journal of Foreign Languages, 24(4), 60–64.
Qiaoyun, L. (2007). Evidential Causal and Abduction. Foreign Languages and Literature, 27(4), 60–64.
Qiaoyun, L. (2008). Formation Mechanism of Evidential Causals. Modern Foreign Languages, 31(3), 238–244.
Qiaoyun, L. (2010). A Study on the Construal Mechanism of English Evidential Causals. Foreign Language Education, 31(5), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2010.05.016
Quirk, R. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Renfei, X. (2009 A Grammatical Optimal Study on Mandarin ‘Cause & Effect’ Complex.
Shuneng, L. (2002). On the Differences Between Chinese and Western Ways of Thinking. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 18(2), 40.
Sweetser. Eve. (2002). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Peking University Press.
Thomas Wasow. (2002). Postverbal Behavior. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Tongxi, G. (2014). A Comparative Study of Figure-Ground Order Between Chinese and English.
Wencheng, G. & Chaoyi. W. (2023). Cognitive Contrast Between English and Chinese Cause and Effect Compound Sentences from the Perspective of Baseline/Elaboration. Foreign Languages Bimonthly, 46(6), 61–69.
Wenguo, P. (2004). An Outline of Chinese-English Contrastive Studies. Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
Xi, L. & Y. D. (2020). Cognitive Interpretations of Diachronic Evolution Features of Focus Markers of Connectives in English-Chinese Cause-Effect Complex Sentences. Foreign Language Education, 3, 52. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2020.03.009
Yin, W. (1999). Iconicity of Linguistic Symbols. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 57(5), 4–7.
Yu Fang, W. (1999). The Information Sequences of Adverbial Clauses in Mandarin Chinese Conversation. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2, 45–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.002
Yu Fang, W. (2002). The Preferred Information Sequences of Adverbial Linking in Mandarin Chinese Discourse. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 22(1), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.002
Yu Fang, W. (2006). The Information Structure of Adverbial Clauses in Chinese Discourse. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 4(1), 49–88. https://doi.org/10.6519/TJL.2006.4(1).2
Yunhua, D & Chunfang. G. (2016). The Priority Sequences of Logical Meaning of English and Chinese Cause-Effect Complex Sentences. Foreign Language Education, 37(06), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2016.06.008
Zhenhai, Q. & X. J. (2015). Evidentiality in Linguistic and Cognitive Representation. Foreign Languages in China, 12(2), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2015.02.006
Zuoyan, S. & Hongyin. T. (2008). A Comparative Study of Chinese and English Causal Clause. Chinese Linguistics, 96(04), 61–71.
The journal operates an Open Access policy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
_(1).png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.png)
.png){kind=logo}
.png)
_-_Copy_-_Copy.png)
