Negative Representation of Assad’s Regime in CNN Online Articles
Abstract
This research article discusses the use of chemical weapons in Syria. This study discusses the representation of Assad’s regime in two CNN articles since there is an assumption that Assad’s regime and its alliances are the responsible ones for the chemical weapon issue in Syria. The data is analyzed through Critical Discourse Analysis by Van Dijk as the grand theory so that it is examined by using macro and micro level analysis. This study shows that these articles present the negative representation of Assad’s regime. It can be seen from the negative lexical choices which are used by the writers to describe Assad’s regime and it also can be seen from the writers attempts to present the US’s arguments by trying to legitimize it by frequently using verbal reaction in schematic analysis and the writers of the articles also struggle to hide another version of truth which stated that the responsible one for the use of chemical weapon in Syria is the rebels groups
Downloads
References
Ghofur, Abd. Kontroversi Hukuman Mati: Analisis Wacana Sastra Kritis The Life of David Gale Film (Perspektif Sociocultural Practice Norman Fairclough), (Okara Journal: Vol 11 No 1, 2017), 197. http://ejournal.stainpamekasan.ac.id/index.php/okara/article/view/1244/896
Irfan, F.P. Representasi Negatif Presiden Joko Widodo dalam Artikel The Daily Mail terkait Konflik antara KPK dan Polri: Analisis Wacana Kritis. Unpublished Thesis Universitas Padjadjaran, 2016.
McKirdy, E., Dewan, A. Gunfire at UN team in Syria stalls chemical weapons inspection. CNN, 2018.
Safitri, D. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Racism in NBC News Online Mass Media of Michael Brown Case in Ferguson Missouri. Thesis UINSA Surabaya, 2015
Van Dijk, T.A. Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1980.
Van Dijk, T.A. Principle of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 1993.
Van Dijk, T.A. Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis. University of Amsterdam, 1995.
Van Dijk, T.A.. Discourse, Power and Access. In C.R Caldas-Coulthard, & M. Coulthard, Text and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.84-104). London: Routledge, 1996.
Van Dijk, T.A. Discourse as Social Interaction Volume I. London: SagePublication, 1997.
Van Dijk, T.A. Discourse as Structure and Process Volume II. London: SagePublication, 1997.
Van Dijk, T.A. News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. London, 1998.
Veselinovic, M., Vonberg, J. Syrian regime 'highly likely' to blame for chemical attack, UK says: CNN, (2018, April 13).
The journal operates an Open Access policy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.