Language Power in the Classroom Viewed from Nietzsche and Heidegger

Moh. Yamin; Fabiola Dharmawanti Kurnia; Ali Mustofa

doi:10.19105/ojbs.v14i1.2683

Moh. Yamin English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Jl. Brigjen H. Hasan Basry Kayu Tangi Banjarmasin 219, Indonesia
Fabiola Dharmawanti Kurnia Art and Language Education Department, Doctoral Program, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jl. Lidah Wetan Surabaya 60213
Ali Mustofa Art and Language Education Department, Doctoral Program, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jl. Lidah Wetan Surabaya 60213

https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v14i1.2683

Abstract views: 375 ,

PDF downloads: 243

Keywords: Heidegger, Language, Language Power, Nietzsche

Abstract

Language should be viewed as the space to build the interaction. The classroom practice in which the teacher and students interact in a teaching-learning activity should be empowered through language. To produce a language aura that can be paid attention by the participants, it is important to put language as the power in the positive side in which every participant respect the language as the power to tie each other. This study aims to explore Nietzsche's and Heidegger's views on the use of language and language power in the classroom and to compare both of their views in the classroom. The expected study is that it has the significance of using the language as the center of communication and teaching-learning. The descriptive qualitative method is applied. The data are taken from four research articles on Nietzsche's and Heidegger’s views dealing with language power in the classroom. Findings and results from each research article are the data for this study. Every finding and result of the research article becomes the data source to discuss. The findings show that the capability in using language can be the space of power so that it drives the class to become effective and there is an interactive dialogue between the teacher and students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Moh. Yamin, English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Jl. Brigjen H. Hasan Basry Kayu Tangi Banjarmasin 219, Indonesia

He is also a doctoral student of Art and Language Education Department, Doctoral Program, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jl. Lidah Wetan Surabaya 60213, Indonesia

References

Aloni, Nimrod. “Empowering Dialogues in Humanistic Education.” Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2011, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00789.x.

Arcilla, René V. “Sand Face: Humanism after Antihumanism.” Educational Theory 65, no. 6 (2015): 655–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12140.

Ayling, Douglas. “Language Can Be Thought of as Metaphor. Is This an Appropriate Metaphor?,” 2002.

Behler, Ernst, Mazzino Montinari Wolfgang, Heinz Wenzel Band, and New York. The Beginnings of Nietzsche’s Theory of Language. New York. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988.

Bingham, Charles. “The Goals of Language, The Language of Goals: Nietzsche’s Concern with Rethoric and Its Educational Implications.” Educational Theory 48, no. 2 (1998): 229–40.

Constâncio, João, and Maria João Mayer Branco. Nietzsche on Instinct and Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2011.

D’Agnese, Vasco. “‘Not-Being-at-Home’: Subject, Freedom and Transcending in Heideggerian Educational Philosophy.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 37, no. 3 (2018): 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-018-9598-3.

Emden, Christian J. Nietzsche on Language, Consciousness, and the Body. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 2005.

Farquhar, Sandy, and Peter Fitzsimons. “Lost in Translation: The Power of Language.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43, no. 6 (2011): 652–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00608.x.

Gordon, P. “Language and Consciousness.” In Encyclopedia of Consciousness, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373873-8.00043-8.

Grozev, Stanul. “Friedrich Nietzsche on the Origins of Language and Truth.” Psychological Research 20, no. 1 (2017): 7–13.

Gupta, Rajeev Kumar. “An Investigation into Heidegger’s Views on Language and Technology w.r.t. ‘Enframing.’” Journal of Arts, Culture, Philosophy, Religion, Language and Literature 1, no. 2 (2017): 65–69.

Harliani, Susi. “The World of Translation.” OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra 13, no. 1 (2019): 121. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v13i1.2272.

Hazelton, Roger. “Nietzsche’s Contribution to the Theory of Language.” The Philosophical Review 52, no. 1 (1943): 47–60.

Heidegger, Martin. Logic as the Question Cencerning the Essence of Language. New York: State University of New York Press, 2009.

———. Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/40126613.

James, Carl. “A Cross-Linguistic Approach to Language Awareness.” Language Awareness 5, no. 3–4 (1996): 138–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1996.9959903.

Katsafanas, Paul. “Nietzsche’s Theory of Mind: Consciousness and Conceptualization.” European Journal of Philosophy 13, no. 1 (2005): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-8373.2005.00220.x.

Lichtenberg, Joseph. “Values, Consciousness, and Language.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 22, no. 5 (2002): 841–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351692209349020.

Lotz, Christian. “Action: Phenomenology of Wishing and Willing in Husserl and Heidegger.” Husserl Studies 22, no. 2 (2006): 121–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-006-9006-7.

Mika, Carl. “Some Thinking from, and Away from, Heidegger.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 48, no. 8 (2016): 827–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1165016.

Peterson, Thomas E. “Notes on Heidegger’s Authoritarian Pedagogy.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 37, no. 4 (2005): 599–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00143.x.

Rosenthal, David M. “Consciousness and Its Function.” Neuropsychologia 46, no. 3 (2008): 829–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.012.

Schalow, Frank. “Language and the Social Roots of Conscience: Heidegger’s Less Traveled Path.” Human Studies 21, no. 2 (1998): 141–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005312105548.

Seigel, Jerrold. “The Human Subject as A Language-Effect.” History of European Ideas 18, no. 4 (1994): 481–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(94)90081-7.

St, A. Fay. “Heidegger on Logic and Language : Some Aporiai” 3, no. 3 (2014): 421–42.

Strong, Tracy B. “Language and Nihilism: Nietzsche’s Critique of Epistemology.” Theory and Society 3, no. 2 (1976): 239–63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/656848.

Su, Ya hui. “Lifelong Learning as Being: The Heideggerian Perspective.” Adult Education Quarterly 61, no. 1 (2011): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713610380442.

Wales, M. L. “Aspects of Language Awareness Used in Some Workplace Esl Programmes.” Language Awareness 2, no. 2 (1993): 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1993.9959823.

Walsh, Steve. “Developing Interactional Awareness in the Second Language Classroom Through Teacher Self-Evaluation.” Language Awareness 12, no. 2 (2003): 124–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410308667071.

Watson, James R. “Nietzsche’s ‘Transnational’ Thinking.” History of European Ideas 15, no. 1–3 (1992): 133–40.

Yacek, Douglas W. “Learning to See with Different Eyes: A Nietzschean Challenge to Multicultural Dialogue.” Educational Theory 64, no. 2 (2014): 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12052.

Yosef-Hassidim, Doron. “Awareness of Wholes: The Ontological Difference as an Educative Source.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 48, no. 8 (2016): 785–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1165013.

Yu, Jie. “The Pedagogy of Heideggerian (Un)Truth: How Can We See Stars by Day in a Deep Dark Well?” Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy 11, no. 1 (2014): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2014.893215.