Cheating Behavior in EFL Classroom (A Case Study at Elementary School in Sidenreng Rappang Regency)

Andi Asrifan; Abd. Ghofur; Nur Azizah

doi:10.19105/ojbs.v14i2.4009

Andi Asrifan English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher and Training, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, South Sulawesi 91651
Abd. Ghofur English Teaching and Learning Program, Tarbiyah Faculty, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura, Pamekasan 69371 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5714-1635
Nur Azizah English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher and Training, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, South Sulawesi 91651

https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v14i2.4009

Abstract views: 1026 ,

PDF downloads: 681

Keywords: Cheating behavior, Teachers’ strategy, Gender

Abstract

Cheating is a common problem yet unresolved issue in the classroom. Some factors make the students cheat, and they do it continually. This article aims to find factors that influence student cheating behavior; the strategies used by the English teacher to overcome student cheating behavior; and the difference in student cheating towards gender. This research is a case study using a descriptive qualitative method. The subjects were UPT SDN 1 Rijang Panua, a sample of schools with 4-grade to 6-grade classes. The questionnaire and the interview were used to collect the data. Data analysis techniques were sequential-parts of the study by Starovoytova and Namango. The result shows that: 1) Three categories of factors that influence student cheating behavior namely a) the situational factor; b) the individual factor; and c) the teacher factor; 2) There are four strategies to overcome student cheating behavior in the EFL Classroom such as explaining the bad impact of cheating behavior, instill character education at an early age, give questions-answer or quiz exercises and give appreciation or praise; 3) there is no difference between cheating behavior based on gender

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agger, Charlotte, and Judith Meece. “Gender and Academic Motivation.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 2 (2015): 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26081-9.

Altmann, Tanya K. “Attitude: A Concept Analysis.” Nursing Forum 43, no. 3 (2008): 144–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00106.x.

Anderman, Eric M., and Tamera B. Murdock. Psychology of Academic Cheating. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011.

Athanasou, James, and Olabisi Olasehinde. “Male and Female Differences in Self-Report Cheating.” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 8, no. 1 (2019): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7275/b4te-5z13.

Blankson, Samuel. Attitude. North Carolina: Lulu.com, 2005.

Bogdan, Robert, and Sari Knopp Biklen. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998.

Cots, Josep-Maria. “Teaching ‘with an Attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL Teaching.” ELT Journal 60, no. 4 (2006): 336–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl024.

Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. California: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2009.

Dewey, John. Experience And Education. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2007.

Diego, Leo Andrew B. “Friends with Benefits: Causes and Effects of Learners’ Cheating Practices During Examination.” IAFOR Journal of Education 5, no. 2 (2017): 121–38. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.5.2.06.

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, and J. R. Martin. Readings in Systemic Linguistics. London: Batsford Academic and Educational, 1981.

Hetherington, E. Mavis, and Solomon E. Feldman. “College Cheating as a Function of Subject and Situational Variables.” Journal of Educational Psychology 55, no. 4 (1964): 212–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045337.

Kukolja Taradi, Suncana, Milan Taradi, and Zoran Dogas. “Croatian Medical Students See Academic Dishonesty as An Acceptable Behaviour: A Cross-Sectional Multicampus Study.” Journal of Medical Ethics 38, no. 6 (2012): 376–79. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100015.

Lazar, M., ed. Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901.

Lidestav, Gun, and Annika Egan Sjölander. “Gender and Forestry: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Forestry Professions in Sweden.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 22, no. 4 (2007): 351–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580701504928.

Maio, Greg, and Geoffrey Haddock. The Psychology of Attitudes and Attitude Change. California: SAGE Publications, 2009.

McTernan, Melissa, Patrick Love, and David Rettinger. “The Influence of Personality on the Decision to Cheat.” Ethics & Behavior 24, no. 1 (2014): 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2013.819783.

Pratkanis, Anthony R., Steven J. Breckler, and Anthony G. Greenwald. Attitude Structure and Function. East Sussex: Psychology Press, 2014.

Samani, Muchlas, and Hariyanto. Pendidikan Karakter Konsep dan Model. PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.

Saptono. Dimensi-Dimensi Pendidikan Karakter: Wawasan, Strategi, dan Langkah Praktis. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2011.

Sheard, Judy, Selby Markham, and Martin Dick. “Investigating Differences in Cheating Behaviours of IT Undergraduate and Graduate Students: The Maturity and Motivation Factors.” Higher Education Research & Development 22 (2003): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000056526.

Starovoytova, Diana, and Saul Namango. “Factors Affecting Cheating-Behavior at Undergraduate-Engineering.” Journal of Education and Practice 7, no. 31 (2016): 66–82. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1122521.pdf.

Syarif, Zainuddin, and Abdul Gaffar. “The Model of National Character Education in Darul Ulum Islamic Boarding School of Banyuanyar, Pamekasan Madura.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Education (ICIE 2018), 261:119–22. Bandung, Indonesia: Atlantis Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2991/icie-18.2018.22.