Leftist Narratives in Tempo Books: Van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) Perspective:

Anas Ahmadi; Abd. Ghofur; Moh. Hafid Effendy; Nike Kusumawati; Nuria Reny Hariyati

doi:10.19105/ojbs.v17i1.8260

Anas Ahmadi Indonesian Language and Literature, Faculty of Language and Art, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya 60213 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2583-2703
Abd. Ghofur English Teaching Learning Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura, Pamekasan 69371 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5714-1635
Moh. Hafid Effendy Indonesian Teaching Learning Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura, Pamekasan 69371 https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3850-4532
Nike Kusumawati Institute of China and Asia Pacific Studies National Sun-Yat Sen University, 804201
Nuria Reny Hariyati Akademi Farmasi Surabaya, Surabaya 60232 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-320X

https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v17i1.8260

Abstract views: 573 ,

PDF downloads: 646

Keywords: Leftists, Critical Discourse Analysis

Abstract

The text in a narrative has hidden meanings. It is necessary to dismantle and reconstruct the new meanings using critical discourse analysis (CDA). Related to that, this study aims to explore leftist narratives in Indonesia as contained in two books published by Tempo through van Dijk’s perspective of critical discourse analysis (CDA). This study used a descriptive-interpretative method which refers to CDA. The results reveal: First, the structure of the topic’s discourse raises the subject that Tempo is on the leftist side through diction, which depicts them as religious, kind, diligent, intelligent, and having a strong sense of nationalism. Microstructurally, in terms of setting, the leftists are those who were close to Sukarno, often recited the Quran (Muslims), repeatedly discussed with the public, and defended them. While in terms of graphics, Tempo books tend to be printed in red, symbolizing communism. Second, social cognition reporting in Tempo tends to side with the PKI and criticize Suharto concerning the G30S/PKI Movement. The two books reveal the ideological conflict between communism (Russia and China) and capitalism/colonialism (the United States and its allies). Third, from the aspect of context, leftists are innocent people and are the only victims of the regime in power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anas Ahmadi, Indonesian Language and Literature, Faculty of Language and Art, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya 60213

ANAS AHMADI, Lecturer in Indonesian Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia. Concern on research in the fields of language, literature, and culture. Scopus ID: 57201349400.

Abd. Ghofur, English Teaching Learning Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura, Pamekasan 69371

ABD. GHOFUR, Lecturer in English Language and Literature, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura, Pamekasan, Indonesia. Concern on research in the fields of languages, language teaching, and social science.

Moh. Hafid Effendy, Indonesian Teaching Learning Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura, Pamekasan 69371

MOH. HAFID EFFENDY, Lecturer in Indonesian Language and Literature, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura, Pamekasan, Indonesia. Concern on research in the fields of language, literature, and culture.

Nike Kusumawati, Institute of China and Asia Pacific Studies National Sun-Yat Sen University, 804201

NIKE KUSUMAWATI, a doctoral candidate at the Institute of China and Asia Pacific Studies National Sun-Yat Sen University, Taiwan.

Nuria Reny Hariyati, Akademi Farmasi Surabaya, Surabaya 60232

NURIA RENY HARIYATI, a doctoral candidate in Universitas Negeri Surabaya and Lecturer I Akademi Farmasi Surabaya, Indonesia

References

Ahmadi, A. (2017). Orang Kiri dalam Buku Tempo. Gresik: Graniti.

Ashbourn, J. (2023). PKI Implementation and Infrastructures. Florida: CRC Press.

Condor, S., & Antaki, C. (1997). Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. In Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Vols. 1–1, pp. 320–347). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884

Crawford, O. (2022). The Communist Manifesto in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 53(3), 562–582.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher (First Edition). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dhakidae, D. (2003). Cendekiawan dan Kekuasaan dalam Negara Orde Baru. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Eriyanto. (1996). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Farid, H. (2005). Indonesia’s Original Sin: Mass Killings and Capitalist Expansion, 1965–66. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 6(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394042000326879

Firdaus, F. (2021). Bangkitnya Paham Komunis di Indonesia. Textura, 2(1), 63-67.

Gabsi, Z. (2015). Response to Islamophobia in the Arabic Islamic Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Intellectual Discourse, 23(2), 229–254.

Gie, S.H.(2005). Orang-orang di Persimpangan Kiri Jalan. Yogyakarta: Bentang Pustaka.

Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology (Vol. 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Hasworo, R. T. (2004). Penangkapan dan Pembunuhan di Jawa Tengah Setelah G-30-S. In J. Roosa, A. Ratih, & H. Farid (Eds.), Tahun yang Tak Pernah Berakhir Memahami Pengalaman Korban 65 (pp. 25–60). Jakarta: Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM) dan Tim Relawan untuk Kemanusiaan Institut Sejarah Sosial Indonesia.

Ikhwan, H., Yulianto, V. I., & Parahita, G. D. (2019). The Contestation of Social Memory in the New Media: A Case Study of the 1965 Killings in Indonesia. Advances in Southeast Asian Studies, 12(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0010

Julia, S. (2017). Pemberontakan PKI 1927 dan 1965: Sebuah Studi Komparasi (Master Thesis, Universitas Negeri Padang). Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang. Retrieved from http://repository.unp.ac.id/14169/

Kareem, W. N., & Rijia, K. I. (2023). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Power in American Political Interviews. Nasaq, 37(6), 1514–1529.

Klikauer, T. (2021). Media Capitalism: Hegemony in the Age of Mass Deception. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87958-7

Kurasawa, A. (2015). Peristiwa 1965: Persepsi dan Sikap Jepang. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Kurniawan; (2013). Pengakuan Algojo 1965: Investigasi Tempo Perihal Pembantaian 1965. Jakarta: Tempo Inti Media. (Jakarta). Retrieved from http://www.librarystftws.org/perpus/index.php?p=show_detail&id=5375&keywords

Laili, R. D. (2016). Perlawanan Masyarakat Desa Tempurejo Kecamatan Widodaren Kabupaten Ngawi Jawa Timur Terhadap Gerakan Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) Tahun 1948 (Diploma Thesis). UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Lin, H., & Galway, M. (2022). “Heirs to What Had Been Accomplished”: D. N. Aidit, the PKI, and Maoism, 1950–1965. Modern Intellectual History, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244322000282

Lundry, C. (2022). Victimhood and Denial: Recent Scholarship on the Legacy of the Indonesian Mass Murders of 1965-66. Estudios de Asia y África, 58(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.24201/eaa.v58i1.2864

Nami, I. B. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kegagalan Gerakan Pemberontakan Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) 1926-1927. Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32734/politeia.v14i1.6360

Neuman, W. L. (2018). Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Pearson.

Patra, H., Anatona, A., & Narny, Y. (2022). Pengawasan Orde Baru Terhadap Eks-Tahanan Politik PKI di Sumatera Barat. Criksetra: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 11(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.36706/jc.v11i1.14724

Pohlman, A. (2014). Incitement to Genocide Against a Political Group: The Anti-Communist Killings in Indonesia. PORTAL Journal of Interdisciplinary International Studies, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5130/portal.v11i1.3292

Pohlman, A. (2016). The Spectre of Communist Women, Sexual Violence and Citizenship In Indonesia. Sexualities, 20(1–2), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716645789

Pradheksa, P. Y. (2021). Islam and Reimagining Communists in Post-New Order Indonesia: An Analysis of White Book of the PKI Terror in Kanigoro. South East Asia Research, 29(4), 520–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2021.2013731

Ritzer, G., & Stepnisky, J. N. (2020). Classical Sociological Theory (8th edition). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Roosa, J. (2006). Pretext for Mass Murder: The September 30 Movement and Suharto's coup d'état in Indonesia. London: University of Wisconsin Press.

Saldana, J. (2018). Writing Qualitatively: The Selected Works of Johnny Saldaña (1st edition). London ; New York: Routledge.

Sufyan, F. H. (2018). Menuju Lentera Merah: Gerakan Propagandis Komunis di Serambi Mekah 1923-1949. Yogyakarta: UGM PRESS.

Statham, S. (2022). Critical Discourse Analysis: A Practical Introduction to Power in Language. London: Routledge.

Suparjan, E. (2016). Peristiwa G 30 S sebagai Isu Kontroversial pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah di SMA Kota Bima. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 5(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPS.051.05

Vaara, E., & Whittle, A. (2022). Common Sense, New Sense or Non-Sense? A Critical Discursive Perspective on Power in Collective Sensemaking. Journal of Management Studies, 59(3), 755–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12783

van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Dialogue and Cognition. In L. Vaina & J. Hintikka (Eds.), Cognitive Constraints on Communication: Representations and Processes (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9188-6_1

van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1(1), 17–21.

van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Context. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (Vol. 10). New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463/wbielsi056

van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse-Cognition-Society: Current state and Prospects oMf the Socio-Cognitive Approach to Discourse. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 121–146). London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593634

van Dijk, Teun A. (1991). Racism and the Press. New York: Routledge.

van Dijk, Teun A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

van Dijk, Teun A. (1997). The study of discourse. Discourse as Structure and Process, 1(34), 703–752.

van Dijk, Teun A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

van Dijk, Teun A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach (Vol. 10). New York: Cambridge University Press.

van Dijk, Teun A. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. UK: Cambridge University Press.

van Dijk, Teun A. (2015). Racism and the Press. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682662

Wijaya, A. F., Wike, W., & Novita, A. A. (2023b). Indonesian Public Administration: Past, Present, and Future. In M. Haque, W. Wong, & K. Ko (Eds.), Handbook on Asian Public Administration (pp. 214–223). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781839104794/book-part-9781839104794-22.xml

Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. New York: Sage.

Zafri, R. (2022). The Latent Danger of Communism Threatens Indonesia. International Journal of Democracy and Development Studies, 5(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839104794.00022

Zulkifli, Arif, et al (Ed.). (2014). Lekra dan Geger 1965. Jakarta: Tempo.

Zulkifli, Arif, et al (Ed.). (2015a). Aidit, Dua Wajah Dipa Nusantara. Jakarta: Tempo.

Zulkifli, Arif, et al (Ed.). (2015b). Musso: Si Merah di Simpang Republik. Jakarta: Tempo.