Implementation of Teacher and Peer Feedback in Writing Hortatory Exposition Text

Putri Lasminiar

doi:10.19105/panyonara.v2i2.3670

Putri Lasminiar English Department, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang 65145, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.19105/panyonara.v2i2.3670

Abstract views: 291 ,

PDF downloads: 263

Keywords: Hortatory Exposition Text, Teacher and Peer Feedback, Writing

Abstract

Feedback from teacher and peer is doubted by experts to be implemented in the students’ writing process because of students’ preference in teacher feedback and students’ lack of ability to give feedback. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the implementation of teacher and peer feedback in the eleventh graders of SMAN 5 Malang in writing hortatory exposition texts. It is Collaborative Classroom Action Research (CAR) and the data were obtained through questionnaires, interview guides, observation checklist, field notes, and students’ writing assignments. The results showed that the implementation of teacher and peer feedback improved the students’ ability in writing hortatory exposition texts especially in the relating thesis statement, argument(s), and recommendation into one another. In terms of content, organization, language use, and mechanic, there were more than 75% of 32 students that could reach score at least 3 (the minimum score). The result also revealed that teacher and peer feedback could create students to become critical and independent learners

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berg, E. C. (1999). The Effects of Trained Peer Response on ESL Students' Revision Types a Writing Quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215–241. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5.

Burgess, S., & Head, K. (2005). How to Teach for Exams. London: Longman.

Cahyono, B. Y. (2010). Second Language Acquisition and English Language Teaching. Malang: State University of Malang Press.

Cahyono, B. Y., & Widiati, U. (2004). The Tapestry of English Language Teaching and Learning in Indonesia. Malang: State University of Malang Press.

Cahyono, B. Y., & Widiati, U. (2015). The Teaching of EFL Listening in the Indonesian Context: The State of the Art. TEFLIN Journal, 20(2), 194–211. doi: 10.15639/teflinjournal.v20i2/194-211.

Carnell, E. (2000). Dialogue, Discussion and Secondary School Students on How Others Help Their Learning (Askew, Ed.). London: Routledge.

Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese Students’ Perceptions of ESL Peer Response Group Interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0.

Chaudron, C. (1988). Second Language Classroom Research on Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Choi, J. (2013). Does Peer Feedback Affect L2 Writers’ L2 Learning, Composition Skills, Metacognitive Knowledge, and L2 Writing Anxiety. English Teaching, 68(3), 187–213. doi: 10.15858/ENGTEA.68.3.201309.187.

Dean, C. B., Hubbell, E. R., Pitler, H., & Stone, B. J. (2011). Classroom Instruction that Works: Research-based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement (2nd ed.). Colorado: McREL.

H., B. (2014). Contribution of Peer Assessment Method to Teacher Education (Unpublished Master Thesis). Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Educational Sciences, Trabzon.

Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding Principles for Effective Peer Response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31–38. doi: 10.1093/elt/cci004.

Harmer, J. (2004). The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York: Pearson Longman.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.

Hill, F. (2007). Feedback to Enhance Student Learning: Facilitating Interactive Feedback on Clinical Skills. International Journal of Clinical Skill, 1(1), 21–24.

Kusumaningrum, S. R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Prayogo, J. A. (2019). The Effect of Different Types of Peer Feedback Provision on EFL Students’ Writing Performance. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 213–224. doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12114app.213-224.

Lam, R. (2010). A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 114. doi: 10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052.

Langan, J. (2001). College Writing Skills with Readings. New York: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Limited.

Lestari, L. A. (2008). The Interactional Approach to the Teaching of Writing and its Implications for Second Language Acquisition. TEFLIN Journal, 19(1), 42–56. doi: 10.15639/teflinjournal.v19i1/42-56.

Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2006). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer Reviews in the ESL Composition Classroom: What do the Students Think? ELT Journal, 46(3), 274–284. doi: 10.1093/elt/46.3.274.

Min, H.-T. (2005). Training Students to Become Successful Peer Reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003.

Min, H.-T. (2006). The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003.

Park, J. (2017). Benefits of the Process Approach in L2 Writing: From the Prospective Teachers’ Perspectives. The Journal of Linguistics Science, 82, 117–136. doi: 10.21296/jls.2017.09.82.117.

Rachmayani, A., Rifai, A., & Rohadi, T. (2018). Exploring Students’ Response to Peer Feedback Strategy INEFL Writing Class at State Senior High School 1 Susukan. ELT Echo : The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 3(1), 59. doi: 10.24235/eltecho.v3i1.2810.

Rodliyah, R. S., Cahyono, B. Y., Widiati, U., & Prayogo, J. A. (2017). The Effect of Meaning-focused Feedback as well as Language-focused Feedback in Journal Writing on Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing Ability. International Journal of English and Education, 6(4), 103–113.

Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 31–54. doi: 10.1191/1362168804lr133oa.

Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Correction on the Accurate Use of Grammatical Forms by Adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002.

Soles, D. (2007). The Concise Guide to Teaching Composition. New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Tai, H.-C., Lin, W.-C., & Yang, S. C. (2015). Exploring the Effects of Peer Review and Teachers’ Corrective Feedback on EFL Students’ Online Writing Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 284–309. doi: 10.1177/0735633115597490.

Ting, M., & Qian, Y. (2010). A Case Study of Peer Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Classroom. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 87–98. doi: http://www.celea.org.cn/teic/92/10120606.pdf.

Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Mukminatien, N., Prayogo, J. A., & Irawati, E. (2019). Students’ Perception of Assessment and Feedback Practices: Making Learning Visible. International Journal of Sustainability, Education, and Global Creative Economic (IJSEGCE), 2(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1234/ijsegce.v2i1.49.

Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The Impact of Two Types of Peer Assessment on Students’ Performance and Satisfaction within a Wiki Environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005.

Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.