About the Journal
Focus and Scope
Journal of ENTITA focuses on any articles dealing with social science education and social studies either in forms of conceptual ideas or research results from various perspectives.
Peer Review Process
The journal follows Single blind peer review policy. The article is sent to many reviewers (the experts in respective field) to review the article in the light of journal's guidelines and features of a quality research article. For articles which require changes, the same reviewers will be used to ensure that the quality of the revised article is acceptable.
The journal follows a systematic review and publication policy:
The submitted manuscript is acknowledged within 12-24 hours upon receipt.
The manuscript/article is sent to many reviewers (article without the name and affiliations of the author(s). The review process takes maximum two weeks.
The review reports are collected from the reviewers and the executive editor will send the review reports to the authors including all terms and conditions of the publication.
If the article is accepted subject to modification, the executive editor will send the review reports to the author/corresponding author including a formal request to modify the article by seven days as per the suggestions of the reviewers. The executive author will send the modified article to the same reviewers of the said article to justify the modifications. If the article is again returned by the reviewers, the article is said to be finally rejected. The journal will not proceed with the said article. However, in case of very minor changes, the editorial board may consider the article for further modifications.
The accepted article is processed for publication (soft copy) upon the successful completion of the journal’s terms and conditions.
Proof Reading. The executive editor will send the processed article for publication (MS Word) to the author/corresponding author for proof reading.
The article is published online first. The executive editor will notify the author/corresponding author about online publication with necessary download link. The author/corresponding author may request for any correction in published article (in case of extremely important changes) within one week of online publication.
The journal is published in print within one until two weeks of online publication.
The executive editor will ask the authors of the published articles to send their correct and complete mailing address (with proper ZIP Code and postal code as well) by one week after print publication.
The executive editor will send the hard copy of the Entita journal if possible to the authors within one or two months after print publication.
ENTITA : Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial is a peer-reviewed journal, available in print, online, and published twice a year. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the Author, the Chief Editor, the Editorial Board, the Peer-Reviewer and the Publisher.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed ENTITA is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.
Department of Social Science Education, Tarbiyah Faculty, IAIN Madura as the publisher of ENTITA takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
The editor of ENTITA is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.