Textbook Evaluation According to Outcome-Based Education (OBE) Principles

  • Leoni Damayanti English Education Department, Faculty of Cultural Studies, University of Brawijaya Malang, Malang 65142, Indonesia
  • Ive Emaliana English Education Department, Faculty of Cultural Studies, University of Brawijaya Malang, Malang 65142, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0939-4336
  • Irene Nany Kusumawardani English Education Department, Faculty of Cultural Studies, University of Brawijaya Malang, Malang 65142, Indonesia
Abstract views: 195 , PDF downloads: 152
Keywords: Extensive reading, Outcome-based education, Reading skill, Textbook evaluation

Abstract

Outcome-Based Education (OBE) is known as the new curriculum that seeks students' outcomes after learning about the materials. According to that, an evaluation through the textbook, as the most-used source in teaching English, especially in Extensive Reading, is needed. The purpose of this paper is to identify whether the textbook is suitable or not based on the OBE principles. Moreover, some capable lecturers participated in evaluating this textbook using a reliable checklist. This research used a descriptive quantitative method with the results showed that in terms of module contents, this textbook is 'very poor,' in terms of module language items, this textbook is 'poor,' then in terms of module presentation expediency, this textbook is 'very poor.' The findings of this study pointed out many lacks of the textbook that need improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ive Emaliana, English Education Department, Faculty of Cultural Studies, University of Brawijaya Malang, Malang 65142, Indonesia

Ive Emaliana's teaching and research interests include EFL epistemic beliefs, inclusive education, language assessment, and English for specific purposes. She is author and coauthor of 9 books including From Literacy to Multiliteracies (2020), Evaluasi Pembalajaran Bahasa Asing pada Pendidikan Tinggi (2019),  Academic Platforms for Students-Researchers (2018), and Success Stories in English Language Teaching and Learning (2014). Her papers were published in some edited books, conference proceedings, and national, international, Scopus-index journals. She can be contacted via e-mail at ive@ub.ac.id.

References

Adi, Hayati Wasistyo, and Puji Astuti. “Content Analysis of Student Book When English Rings a Bell (Revised Edition) for Grade VIII of Junior High School.” ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching 8, no. 1 (2019): 49–59. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v8i1.26138.

Asiyaban, Amir Reza. “Scrutinizing the Appropriateness of the Intermediate ILI English Series in the EFL Context of Iran” 4, no. 6 (2014): 1257–65. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.6.1257-1265.

Blume, Carolyn. “Games People (Don’t) Play: An Analysis of Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Behaviors and Beliefs Regarding Digital Game-Based Language Learning.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 33 (2020): 109–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552599.

Cortazzi, Martin, and Lixian Jin. “Cultural Mirrors: Materials and Methods in the EFL Classroom.” In Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning, edited by Eli Hinkel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Cunningsworth, Alan. Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heineman, 1995.

Fey, Carl-Christian, and Eva Matthes. “Textbook Quality Criteria and Evaluation.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies, edited by Eckhardt Fuchs and Annekatrin Bock, 157–67. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53142-1_11.

Gholami, Reza, Nooreen Noordin, and Shameem Rafik-Galea. “A Thorough Scrutiny of ELT Textbook Evaluations: A Review Inquiry.” International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies 5, no. 3 (2017): 82–91. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.3p.82.

Hashem Neghad, Hossein. “Reflection of Learning Theories in Iranian ELT Textbooks.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies 5, no. 2 (2014): 115–19. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.2p.115.

Ivić, Ivan. “Printed and Digital Media: Printed and Digital Textbooks.” Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal 9, no. 3 (2019): 25–49. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.694.

Khanna, Richa, and Divya Mehrotra. “The Roadmap for Quality Improvement from Traditional through Competency Based (CBE) Towards Outcome Based Education (OBE) in Dentistry.” Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research 9, no. 2 (2019): 139–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.02.004.

Lee, C.Y., and Hsien-Chin Liou. “A Study of Using Web Concordancing for English Vocabulary Learning in a Taiwanese High School Context.” English Teaching & Learning 27 (2003): 35–56.

Maleki, Ataollah, Fariba Mollaee, and Robab Khosravi. “A Content Evaluation of Iranian Pre-University ELT Textbook.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4, no. 5 (2014): 995–1000. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.5.995-1000.

Mertens, Donna M. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. London: SAGE Publications, 2014.

Mukundan, Jayakaran, and Vahid Nimehchisalem. “Evaluative Criteria of an English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3, no. 6 (2012): 1128–34. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.6.1128-1134.

Mulyasa, E. Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.

Pedoman Pendidikan Fakultas (for ELT Program). Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Brawijaya, 2017.

Reiss, Jodi. Teaching Content to English Language Learners. New York: Longman, 2005.

Richards, Jack C. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Sheldon, Lee. “Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials.” ELT Journal 42, no. 4 (1988): 237–46.

Sun, Ye, and Thi Ngoc Yen Dang. “Vocabulary in High School EFL Textbooks: Texts and Learner Knowledge.” System 93 (2020): 102–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102279.

Tomlinson, Brian. Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: A&C Black, 2003.

Tomlinson, Brian. English Language Learning Materials: A Critical Review. London: Continuum, 2008.

Tomlinson, Brian. “What Do Teachers Think about English Coursebooks?” Modern English Teacher 19, no. 4 (2010): 5–9.

Ur, Penny. A Course in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Widodo, Handoyo Puji. “Textbook Analysis on College Academic Writing.” TEFLIN Journal 18, no. 2 (2007): 109–22. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v18i2/109-122.

Wuttisrisiriporn, Niwat, and Siriluck Usaha. “The Development of a Localized ELT Textbook Evaluation Checklist: A Case Study from Thailand.” Thaitesol Journal 32, no. 2 (2019): 46–64.

Yan-Fei, Su. “An Evaluation of Extensive Reading Course Book—Contemporary College English: Companion Reader.” US-China Foreign Language 14, no. 10 (2016): 717–22. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8080/2016.10.007.

Zou, Bin, Hui Li, and Jiaying Li. “Exploring a Curriculum App and a Social Communication App for EFL Learning.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 31, no. 7 (2018): 694–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1438474.

Published
2021-05-31