Pedagogic Competencies of PPL Teachers In ‎Madura: ‎ An Analysis of Tutors and Students’ Perceptions

  • Abd. Mukhid Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura
Abstract views: 22 , PDF downloads: 14
Keywords: Pedagogic ‎Competencies, PPL Teachers, Perceptions, Tutors, Students

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out two things, namely how (a) the perception of civil servant teachers and (b) students' perceptions of the pedagogic competence of PPL teachers in schools. This study uses a descriptive type of quantitative approach. The research subjects consisted of 15 civil servant teachers and 237 students, 24 PPL teachers, and 4 schools/madrasahs, following the provisions of the 10% random sampling technique from Arikunto. The results showed that (a) the PPL teacher's pedagogic competence based on the perception of the civil servant teacher was classified as good. This is evidenced by the value of 73% of respondents' answers (H0 is rejected) (b) PPL teacher's pedagogic competence based on students' perceptions is quite adequate. This is evidenced by the value of 69.83% of the respondents' answers. (H0 is rejected). Based on the research findings, it is hoped that (a) civil servant teachers can provide more optimal guidance to student practitioners regarding lesson plans, discipline, order, and others; (b) students are expected to pay more attention to and optimize their potential when participating in learning with PPL teachers, (c) practical students as PPL teachers are expected to better master the characteristics of students, learning theories, better prepared in preparing lesson plans, better able in carry out educational learning, are better able to develop the potential of students, are better able to communicate effectively and politely, are better able to carry out and use evaluations, and are reflective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Muhammad. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Bandung: Angkasa. 1994.
Arifin, Kapita Selekta Pendidikan (Islam dan Umum). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, Cet. Ke- 3. 1995.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian,Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2010.
Azwar, Saifuddin. Metode Penelitian, Cet. VIII. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 2007.
Baharun, Hasan and Awwaliyah, Robiatul.‘Pendidikan Multikultural Dalam Menanggulangi Narasi Islamisme Di Indonesia, Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 5.2. 2017.
Ball, D.L, Thames, M.H. dan Phelps. G. Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Diperoleh dari: http://conferences.illinoisstate.ed u/nsa/papers/thamesphelps.pdf, diakses 2 September 2018. 2008.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen, (Jakarta: Depdiknas). 2005.
Desmita. Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. 2012.
Echols, John M. dan Shadili, Hassan. Kamus Inggris Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. 2012.
Hadiprayitno, Gito. dkk. Kompetensi Profesional dan Pedagogi Mahasiswwa dalam Pelaksanaan Program Pengalaman Lapangan. Cakrawala Pendidikan, Juni, Th. XXXV, No. 2. 2016.
Hashona, Achmad Hasmi. Kajian Pelaksanaan Praktik Pengalaman Lapangan (PPL) Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan IAIN Wali Songo Semarang, Jurnal Cendekia, Vol 12, No. 2, Juli – Desember. 2014.
Huda, Miftahul. Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset. 2013.
Kunandar. Guru Profesional Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). 2007.
Mahdi, Nursalmi. Isa, Qudwatin Nisak M. dan Mulyati, Dewi. Kompetensi mahasiswa PPL Prodi Pendidikan Biologi Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Ar-Raniry Dalam Pengajaran Biologi (Studi Kasus Pada MAN Kota Banda Aceh).Jurnal Biotik. Vol. 1, no. 1., Ed. April, 2013.
Mukhid, Abd. dkk. Buku Pedoman Pratikum Jurusan Tarbiyah IAIN Madura, Pamekasan: IAIN Madura Press. 2018.
Mulyasa, E. Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya: Bandung, Cet. Ke-3. 2008.
Narbuko dan Ahmadi. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara. 2003.
Nurfuadi. Profesionalisme Guru. Purwakarta: STAIN Press. 2013.
Persiapan Menghadapi Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada Cet. Ke-1. 2013.
Rahmat, Jalaluddin. Psikologi Komunukasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. 2007.
Roestiyah NK, Masalah-Masalah Ilmu Keguruan. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, Cet k IV, 2001). 2007.
Ruslan, Rosady. Metode Penelitian PR dan Komunikasi . Jakarta: RadjaGrafindo Persada. 2003.
Sagala, Syaiful. Kemampuan Professional Guru Dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2009.
Setyosari, Punaji. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group). 2010.
Shulman, L. S. Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15. 1986.
Suardi, Edi. Pedagogik, (Bandung: Angkasa Offset). 1979.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2010.
-----------. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2011.
-----------. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2017.
Suharto, Toto. Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruz Media. 2011.
Tirtaraharja, Umar dan Lasula. Pengantar Pendidikan, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta). 2000.
Undang-Undang RI No. 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen, (Bandung: Fermana), Pasal 1, No. 1.
Walgito, Bimo. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. (Yogyakarta: Andi Offset). 2010.
Wardani, I.G.K dan Anah, Suparno Suhaenah. Program Pengalaman Lapangan. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi. 1994.
Yamin, Martinis. Profesionalisasi Guru dan Implementasi KTSP, (Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press), Cet. Ke-2. 2007.
Published
2022-07-28
How to Cite
Abd. Mukhid. 2022. “Pedagogic Competencies of PPL Teachers In ‎Madura: ‎ An Analysis of Tutors and Students’ Perceptions”. TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 17 (1), 222-34. https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v17i1.5801.
Section
Articles