Exploring the Ethical Dimensions of Testing and Assessment: An Investigation Into Grade Inflation Among EFL Teachers
Abstract views: 356
,
PDF downloads: 317
Abstract
Concerns over grade inflation have been raised since teachers tend to give students higher grades than they should. If the level of achievement does not correspond to an appropriate improvement in quality, it can raise concerns about the value of grades as a meaningful measure of academic achievement as well as the integrity and effectiveness of the education system. This research aims to find out how EFL teachers perceive grade inflation and what procedures and ethical considerations they follow in the grade inflation process. A descriptive qualitative study was employed using structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with two high school EFL teachers in Bandung. The result showed that although academic performance remains a central consideration, unconscious biases may influence grading when student behavior is factored into assessments. Moreover, teachers acknowledge the dilemma of doing grade inflation where they actually get pressure implicitly from the assessment system, which often takes the form of minimum competency standard (KKM/KKTP). However, they approach it positively, viewing it as an opportunity to enhance student abilities. Despite employing different procedures and assessment criteria in their grade inflation practices, both teachers incorporate ethics. This highlights the need for all teachers to understand and implement ethical grading practices.
Downloads
References
Adom, D., Adu-Mensah, J., & Dake, D. A. (2020). Test, Measurement, and Evaluation: Understanding and Use of the Concepts in Education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(1), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20457
Al-Jarf, R. (2022). Grade Inflation in Language and Translation Courses at Saudi Schools and Universities. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjtep.2022.1.2.2
Allen, M. (2017). The Sage Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411
Anderson, L. W. (2018). A Critique of Grading: Policies, Practices, and Technical Matters. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(49). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3814
Arrafii, M. A. (2020). Grades and Grade Inflation: Exploring Teachers’ Grading Practices in Indonesian EFL Secondary School Classrooms. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28(3), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1663246
Ayu, A. F. K., Musdiani, & Novita, R. (2024). Model Sekolah Bermutu Berbasis “Quality Assurance” (Studi Kasus di Muamalat Solidarity Boarding School [MSBS]). Visipena, Special Issue, 82–98.
Azizi, Z. (2022). Fairness in Assessment Practices in Online Education: Iranian University English Teachers’ Perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00164-7
Azizi, Z., & Ismail, S. M. (2023). What Ethical Requirements Should Be Considered in Language Classroom Assessment? Insights from High School Students. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00235-3
Baglione, S. L., & Smith, Z. (2022). Grade Inflation: Undergraduate Students’ Perspective. Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 30(2), 251–267.
Blum, S. D. (2020). Introduction: Why Upgrade? Why Grade? In S. D. Blum (Ed.), Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead) (pp. 1–22). Morganstown: West Virginia University Press.
Bonner, M. W. (2016). Grading Rigor in Counselor Education: A Specifications Grading Framework. Educational Research Quarterly, 39(4), 21–41.
Brookhart, S. M. (1998). Why ‘Grade Inflation’ is not a Problem with a ‘Just Say No’ Solution. National Forum, Phi Beta Kappa Journal, 78(2), 3-6.
Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Stevens, M. T., & Welsh, M. E. (2016). A Century of Grading Research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803–848. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069
Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment. New York: Routledge.
Caruth, D. L., & Caruth, G. D. (2013). Grade Inflation: An Issue for Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 102–110.
Chen, P. P., & Bonner, S. M. (2017). Teachers’ Beliefs about Grading Practices and a Constructivist Approach to Teaching. Educational Assessment, 22(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2016.1271703
Cheng, L., & Sun, Y. (2015). Teachers’ Grading Decision Making: Multiple Influencing Factors and Methods. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(2), 213-233.
Chowdhury, F. (2018). Grade Inflation: Causes, Consequences and Cure. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 86. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n6p86
Cote, J., & Allahar, A. L. (2011). Lowering Higher Education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442693456
De Boer, H., Timmermans, A. C., & Van Der Werf, M. P. C. (2018). The Effects of Teacher Expectation Interventions on Teachers’ Expectations and Student Achievement: Narrative Review and Meta-analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(3–5), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1550834
Disdikbud Jabar. (2022). Petunjuk Teknis Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru (PPDB) pada Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA), Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK), dan Sekolah Luar Biasa (SLB) Provinsi Jawa Barat Tahun Pelajaran 2022/2023. Bandung: Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat.
Ditjen Dikdasmen. (2017). Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Duggan, C., & Bush, K. (2014). The Ethical Tipping Points of Evaluators in Conflict Zones. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(4), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214014535658
Duncan, C., & Noonan, B. (2007). Factors Affecting Teachers’ Grading and Assessment Practices. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 1-21.
Educational Testing Service. (2014). ETS Standards for Quality and Fairness. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
Fan, X., Johnson, R., Liu, X., & Gao, R. (2020). College Students’ Views of Ethical Issues in Classroom Assessment in Chinese Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education,45(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075 079.2020.1732908
Fan, X., Johnson, R., & Liu., X. (2017). Chinese University Professors’ Perceptions about Ethical Issues in Classroom Assessment Practices. New Waves Educational Research & Development, 20(2), 1–19.
Fan, X., Johnson, R., Liu, X., & Gao, R. (2022). College Students’ Views of Ethical Issues in Classroom Assessment in Chinese Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1732908
Fan, X., Johnson, R., Liu, X., & Zhang, T. (2019). A Comparative Study of Pre-service Teachers’ Views on Ethical Issues in Classroom Assessment in China and the United States. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(2), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0015-7
Feldman, J. (2019). Beyond Standards-Based Grading: Why Equity Must Be Part of Grading Reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(8), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721719846890
Fiarman, S. E. (2016). Unconscious Bias: When Good Intentions Aren’t Enough. Educational Leadership, 74(3), 10–15.
Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., & Levinson, M. (2020). What is Wrong with Grade Inflation (If Anything)? Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 23(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.7202/1070362ar
Gamage, K. A. A., Silva, E. K. de, & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online Delivery and Assessment During COVID-19: Safeguarding Academic Integrity. Education Sciences, 10(11), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110301
Gershenson, S., Holt, S. B., & Tyner, A. (2022). Making the Grade: The Effect of Teacher Grading Standards on Student Outcomes. (EdWorkingPaper: 22-644). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/3vyr-jy06
Green, A. (2014). Exploring Language Assessment and Testing: Language in Action. London: Routledge.
Green, S. K., Johnson, R. L., Kim, D.-H., & Pope, N. S. (2007). Ethics in Classroom Assessment Practices: Issues and Attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.042
Gronlund, N. E. (1998). Assessment of Student Achievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Guskey, T. R. (2020). Get Set, Go! Creating Successful Grading and Reporting Systems. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
Guskey T. R., & Brookhart S.M. (2019). What We Know about Grading. Alexandria: ASCD.
Guskey, T. R., & Link, L. J. (2019). Exploring the Factors, Teachers Consider in Determining Students’ Grades. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1555515
Holden, O. L., Norris, M. E., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2021). Academic Integrity in Online Assessment: A Research Review. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.639814
JCSEE. (2015). The Student Evaluation Standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Karadag, E. (2021). Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Grade Inflation in Higher Education in Turkey. Plos One, 16(8), e0256688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256688
King, B. (2015). Changing college majors: Does It Happen More in Stem and Do Grades Matter? Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(3), 44–51.
Kostal, J. W., Kuncel, N. R., & Sackett, P. R. (2016). Grade Inflation Marches On: Grade Increases from the 1990s to 2000s. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 35(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12077
Ledlow, N. A. (2022). Equity in Grading: Teachers’ Grading Practices and Beliefs Towards Student-Teacher Responsibility in the Classroom (Doctoral Dissertations). Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo.
Lekholm, A. K. (2011). Effects of School Characteristics on Grades in Compulsory School. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(6), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.555923
Lekholm, A., & Cliffordson, C. (2009). Effects of Student Characteristics on Grades in Compulsory School. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 1–23.
Liu, J., Johnson, R., & Fan, X. (2016). A Comparative Study of Chinese and United States Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions about Ethical Issues in Classroom Assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 48, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.01.002
Malouff, J. M., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2016). Bias in Grading: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Research Findings. Australian Journal of Education, 60(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116664618
McEntarffer, R. (2022). Grading. In Grading. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138609877-REE34-1
McMillan, J. H. (2018). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice that Enhance Student Learning and Motivation. Boston: Pearson.
Meissel, K., Meyer, F., Yao, E. S., & Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2017). Subjectivity of Teacher Judgments: Exploring Student Characteristics That Influence Teacher Judgments of Student Ability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.021
Nordin, M., Heckley, G., & Gerdtham, U. (2019). The Impact of Grade Inflation on Higher Education Enrolment and Earnings. Economics of Education Review, 73, 101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101936
Nowruzi, M. (2021). A Study of EFL Teachers’ Classroom Grading Practices in Secondary Schools and Private Institutes: A Mixed Methods Approach. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00145-2
Oleinik, A. (2009). Does Education Corrupt? Theories of Grade Inflation. Educational Research Review, 4(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.03.001
Olsen, B., & Buchanan, R. (2019). An Investigation of Teachers Encouraged to Reform Grading Practices in Secondary Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 2004–2039. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219841349
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian (The Ministry of Education’s Regulation No. 66, on Assessment Standards). (2013).
Peraturan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Indonesia (The Ministry of Education’s Regulation No. 23, on Assessment Standards). (2016). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/224434/permendikbud-no-23-tahun-2016
Pollio, M., & Hochbein, C. (2015). The Association between Standards-Based Grading and Standardized Test Scores as an Element of a High School Reform Model. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 117(11), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511701106
Puslitjakdikbud. (2020). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Tahun 2020. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan.
Prøitz, T. S. (2013). Variations in Grading Practice – Subjects Matter. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 22629. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i3.22629
Quinn, D. M. (2020). Experimental Evidence on Teachers’ Racial Bias in Student Evaluation: The Role of Grading Scales. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720932188
Randall, J., & Engelhard, G. (2009). Examining Teacher Grades Using Rasch Measurement Theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2009.01066.x
Rouai, G. (2020). Teachers’ Beliefs and Views on Grade Inflation in the Algerian Universities (Master Degree Dissertation). Abdelhamid Ibn Badis University, Mostaganem.
Sackstein, S. (2015). Hacking Assessment: 10 Ways to Go Gradeless in a Traditional Grades School. Cleveland: Times 10 Publications.
Sun, Y., & Cheng, L. (2014). Teachers’ Grading Practices: Meaning and Values Assigned. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.768207
Taylor, L. (2013). Communicating the Theory, Practice and Principles of Language Testing to Test Stakeholders: Some Reflections. Language Testing, 30(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480338
Tierney, R. D. (2014). Fairness as a Multifaceted Quality in Classroom Assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.003
Tierney, R. D. (2015). Altered grades: A Grey Zone in the Ethics of Classroom Assessment. Assessment Matters, 8, 5–30. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0002
Tobisch, A., & Dresel, M. (2017). Negatively or Positively Biased? Dependencies of Teachers’ Judgments and Expectations Based on Students’ Ethnic and Social Backgrounds. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 731–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9392-z
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. (2005). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40266/uu-no-14-tahun-2005
Wahyuni, S. (2019). Stop Manipulasi Nilai pada Siswa! Repositori Kemdikbud. Retrieved from https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/14869/1/opini%20%281%29%20%20GGD%20Sri%20Wahyuni.pdf
Williams, L. G. (2015). Review of Ethics Principles and Guidance in Evaluation and Research. OECD
Yeritsyan, A., Mjelde, J. W., & Litzenberg, K. K. (2022). Grade Inflation or Grade Increase. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 54(2), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2022.15
Zulaiha, S. (2017). Teachers’ Grading Practices: In Search for Clear Grading Criteria. Journal of ELT Research: The Academic Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 15–23. Retrieved from https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jer/article/view/157
The journal operates an Open Access policy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
_(1).png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.png)
.png){kind=logo}
.png)
_-_Copy_-_Copy.png)
