Implementation of Online Learning System When Covid-19 in The Republic of Tatarstan, Russia

  • Refly Setiawan Kazan Federal University, Russia
  • Ida Farida University of Bandar Lampung
Abstract views: 340 , PDF downloads: 325


Abstract: The implementation of the online learning system is one of the right steps taken by the Government of the Republic of Tatarstan in preventing the spread of the Covid-19 virus in the territory of the Republic of Tatarstan. This study aims to describe the implementation of online learning when the Covid-19 outbreak in the Republic of Tatarsatan and to find out how students' satisfaction and motivation to learn by implementing the online learning system. The research method used in this study is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. Data collection is done through interviews, documentation, and observation with data collection tools that have been prepared. The location in this study in the Republic of Tatarstan is precisely at Kazan Federal University. The results showed that the implementation of online learning systems in the Republic of Tatarstan especially at Kazan Federal University had not been fully effective. That is because there are still many student complaints about using online learning applications such as Microsoft teams in learning activities at Kazan Federal University and most students do not fully understand the material delivered by lecturers in online learning.


Keywords: Online Learning System, Covid-19, Republic of Tatarstan


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Refly Setiawan, Kazan Federal University, Russia
Department of Political Science, Kazan Federal University, Russia
Ida Farida, University of Bandar Lampung
Lecturer in the Department of Public Administration, University of Bandar Lampung, Indonesia


Agarwal, S,. & Kaushik, J., S. (2020). Student's Perception of Online Learning during COVID Pandemic. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 87(7). 554. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03327-7.

Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson, The theory and practice of online learning (2nd Ed). Canada: AU Press. Athabasca University.

Allen, J., Rowan, L., & Singh, P. (2020). Teaching and teacher education in the time of COVID19. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 48(3). 233-236.doi:10.1080/1359866X.2020.1752051.

Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world. London. Kogan Page.Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches.

California: SAGE Publication. Inc.

Graney, K. (2015). Tatarstan: adjusting to life in Putin's Russia. Journal Nationalities Papers. 44(1). 1-3. doi:10.1080/00905992.2015.1103723.

Gulbahar, Y. (2009). E-Learning. Turkey: Pegem Academy Publishing.

Farida, I., Setiawan, R. (2018). Leadership In Cope With Prostitute In Social Department of Bandar Lampung. International Journal of Social Sciences And Development, 2 (1). 1-8.

HSE Moscow. (2020). News about Covid-19 and the academic year. Ivan Prostakov: Author.

Kazan Federal University. (2020). University Profile and Ranking. Rector of Kazan Federal University / Ilshat Gafurov : Author.

Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching. A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge, pp 80-90.

Minobrnauki. (2020). News about Education in Russia when Covid-19. Falkov Valery Nikolaevich: Author.

Munkhtsetseg, N., & Uyanga, S. (2013). Implementation of E-Learning System: Findings and Lessons Learned. Intelligent Information Management. 5(1). 18-24. doi:10.4236/iim.2013.51003.

Murphy, M. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Journal Contemporary Security Policy. 41(33). 492-505. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749.

Newton, D., Hase, S., & Ellis, A. (2002). Effective implementation of online learning: a case study of the Queensland mining industry. Journal of Workplace Learning. 14 (4). 156-165. doi: 10.1108/13665620210427285.

Nizamova, L., R. (2016). Ethnic Tatars in contention for recognition and autonomy:Bilingualism and pluri-cultural education policies in Tatarstan. Journal Nationalities Papers. 44(1). 771-91. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2015.1124076.

Russian Center for Science and Culture. (2019). The Number Of Indonesian Students In Russia.Vitally Glinkin: Author.

Setiawan, R. (2017). Partisipasi Publik Dalam Program Bantuan Listrik Pedesaan Masyarakat Kabupaten Mesuji. Jurnal Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik (e-JKPP), 3, (3). 82-92.

Setiawan, R. (2017). Peranan Etika Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Pelayanan Publik Pada Dinas Kependudukan Dan Catatan Sipil (Disdukcapil) Kota Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik (e-JKPP), 2 (2), 46-57.

Shahmoradi, L., Changizi, V., & Jannat, B. (2018). The Challenges of E-learning System: Higher Educational Institutions Perspective. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 7(1). 116. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_39_18.

Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT press. pp. 293–295.