A Perspective on Human Rights, The Economic Liberalization of Education Provision in Indonesia
Abstract views: 212
,
PDF downloads: 187
Abstract
A single embedded case study and a descriptive qualitative methodology are used in this study. sources of information include people or organizations, activities or events, documents and archives, as well as literature. The objectives of this study are to identify the economic liberalization that has taken place in the implementation of education in Indonesia, identify the effects of this economic liberalization, and discover the economic liberalization that has taken place in the education provision in Indonesia through its perspective of human rights. Education is a fundamental right that every citizen has access to, as stated in the preamble of the Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, which is about the nation's intellectual life. Everyone needs education to provide them with new knowledge. The economic liberalization of education provision refers to the recent use of education as a new tool to profit from all angles. Those with lower income levels may notice the effects of economic liberalization in the implementation of this education because it becomes more challenging for them to obtain the best education. Complete facilities and top-notch teaching staff are necessary for good education. The results of the study indicate that diverse parties must promote instruction that adheres to Indonesian national standards. Disparities and prejudice against particular groups seeking a great education must be removed in order to guarantee that every student has equitable access to a high-quality education that will help them develop their potential and talents in the future. The government, as the highest authority, should carry out planned programs in line with the desired objectives by evaluating field data and keeping an eye on connected parties' performance. The government will be able to maintain broad control over program execution as a result, without concentrating on or supporting any particular group.
Downloads
References
Akhrorjon, A., & Zumradkhan, K. (2022). THE IMPACT AND RESULTS OF MEMBERSHIP OF THE WTO ON THE EDUCATION SYSTEM. Educational Research in Universal Sciences, 1(5), 24–32.
Amrulloh, A. (2022). Peningkatan Peran Pajak dalam Pembangunan Nasional Melalui Implementasi Tax Amnesty. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 11(05), 201–206.
Devidal, P. (2012). Trading away human rights? The GATS and the right to education: A legal perspective. In Global neoliberalism and education and its consequences (pp. 93–121). Routledge.
Drake, P. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (2021). The Origins of Liberty: Political and Economic Liberalization in the Modern World. Princeton University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=HOgSEAAAQBAJ
Filip, B. (2020). The Rise of Neo-liberalism and the Decline of Freedom. Springer International Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=TlQMEAAAQBAJ
Hadi, S. (2021). Konstruksi Belajar Multi Arah pada Implementasi Model Merdeka Belajar dan Kampus Merdeka (Learning Analysis of How to Learn based on Self Awareness). ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.19105/EJPIS.V3I2.4882
Hartono, H. (2015). Otonomi Pendidikan. Potensia: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 1(1), 51–66.
Jackson, J. H. (2006). Reflections on the possible research agenda for exploring the relationship between human rights norms and international trade rules. International Trade and Human Rights: Foundations and Conceptual Issues, 19–28.
Joseph, S. (2013). Blame it on the WTO: a human rights critique. Oxford University Press.
Keet, A. (2018). Crisis and critique: Critical theories and the renewal of citizenship, democracy, and human rights education. Critical Human Rights, Citizenship, and Democracy Education: Entanglements and Regenerations.
Lyons, J. L. (2019). The WTO and the OECD: The Other Two Horsemen of the Global Edpocalyse. In Globalization and the Neoliberal Schoolhouse (pp. 167–185). Brill.
Muharromah, S. I., Tarbiyah, F., Program, M., Ilmu, S., Sosial, P., Kudus, I., Fatmawati, N., & Program, D. (2021b). Peningkatan Pembelajaran IPS di MTs/SMP Berbasis Kurikulum 13 dalam Membentuk Sumber Daya Manusia yang Unggul dan Berkarakter. ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.19105/EJPIS.V3I2.5224
No, P. P. (76 C.E.). Tahun 2007 tentang Kriteria dan Persyaratan Penyusunan Bidang Usaha Yang Tertutup dan Bidang Usaha Yang Terbuka Dengan Persyaratan di Bidang Penanaman Modal.
Nugmanova, M., Mikkola, H., Rozanov, A., & Komleva, V. (2020). Education, Human Rights and Peace in Sustainable Development. IntechOpen. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=MmwtEAAAQBAJ
Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Returns to investment in education.
Rajab, B. (2004). Negara Orde Baru: Berdiri di Atas Sistem Ekonomi dan Politik yang Rapuh. Sosiohumaniora, 6(3), 182.
Rizaq, A. D. B. El, & Sarmini, S. (2021). Secondary School Teachers and Learners Perspective for Future of Education Post COVID-19 Pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(1), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.24042/TADRIS.V6I1.8385
Rosser, A. (2013). The Politics of Economic Liberalization in Indonesia: State, Market and Power. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=BGX6kjzQoj4C
Ruch, R. S. (2003). Higher Ed, Inc.: The rise of the for-profit university. JHU Press.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Education and economic growth. Teachers College Record, 62(10), 46–88.
Tanfidzi Dahma Putra, A., Kasdi Jurusan Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan, A., & Pascasarjana, F. (2020). Respons Guru Dalam Menumbuhkan Nilai Mandiri Melalui Pembelajaran IPS Selama Masa Adaptasi Kebiasaan Baru Covid-19 di Jawa Timur. ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.19105/EJPIS.V2I2.3883
Ulfah, S. M. (2021). Mencermati Arah Pendidikan Indonesia. Journal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Pemerintahan.
Verger, A. (2010). WTO/GATS and the global politics of higher education. Routledge.
Vromen, A. (2018). Qualitative methods. Theory and Methods in Political Science, 237–253.
Warsono, Prasetyo, K., Trilaksana, A., & Agung Dwi Bahtiar El Rizaq. (2019). Educational Staff Responses About Policy Models About Career Development Policy Models at Surabaya State University. 383(Icss), 460–463. https://doi.org/10.2991/icss-19.2019.188
Copyright (c) 2023 ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial operates an Open Access policy under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial 4.0 International license. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The copyright of the received article once accepted for publication shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher with licensed under a
- Journal is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Journal is permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
- Here is Copyright Transfer Form that author can download and send to OJS during submission.
