Motivasi Belajar Siswa dalam Berliterasi di SD Negeri Kebonsari Kulon 6 Kota Probolinggo
Abstract
Student learning motivation can be associated with information skills in learning Indonesian. The focus of this research is on three things, namely (1) the results of students' motivation in literacy; (2) literacy AKM (Minimum Competency Assessment); (3) the correlation between learning motivation and AKM literacy of students at Kebonsari Kulon 6 Public Elementary School, Probolinggo City. Quantitative research with descriptive statistical analysis was used as a research method for fifth grade students who took the AKM test by the Teaching Campus Program Batch 3. Questionnaires and tests were used for data collection techniques. In analyzing the results, it’s strengthened by the theory of learning motivation by Duncan and Mckeachie which has six aspects in measuring learning motivation including anxiety, self-confidence, belief control, task value, extrinsic orientation goals, and intrinsic orientation goals. The results of this study revealed that students learning motivation and AKM literacy were very high but the correlation value between the two was still very weak. This can be seen from several factors, which include students' understanding of the AKM Literacy question and the preparation of learning strategies that have high quality and are effective.
Downloads
References
Adiputra, S., & Mujiyati, M. (2017). Motivasi dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa di Indonesia: Kajian Meta-Analisis. Konselor, 6(4), 150–157.
Arikunto, S. (2009). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Azriansyah, Istiningsih, S., & Setiawan, H. (2021). Analisis Hambatan Guru dalam Pelaksanaan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS) Di SDN 32 Cakranegara. Renjana Pendidikan Dasar, 1(4), 262–269.
Carnita, D. R. A. (2019). Analisis Motivasi Belajar Matematika Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Skripsi S1 Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Duncan, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (2015). Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) Manual. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences.
Emda, A. (2017). Kedudukan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran. Lantanida Journal, 5(2), 93–196.
Fauzan, M., Amin, M., Ahroza, M., & Misliawati. (2021). Penguatan Literasi Baru pada Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah dalam Menjawab Tantangan Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Pascasarjana UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, 1(1), 156–168.
Gilster, P., & Watson, T. (1997). An Excerpt from Digital Litearcy. Digital Literacy.
Hartini, T. S., & Warmi, A. (2019). Analisis Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di SMP. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Sesiomadika, 2(1c), 640–646.
Hermawan, I. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed Method) (Pertama). Hidayatul Quran Kuningan.
Ibda, H. (2018). Penguatan Literasi Baru pada Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah dalam Menjawab Tantangan Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. JRTI: Journal of Research and Thought of Islamic Education, 1(1), 1–21.
Jariah, S., & Marjani. (2019). Peran Guru dalam Gerakan Literasi Sekolah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 12(1), 846–856.
Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah.
Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. Nomor 17 Tahun 2021. Tentang Asesmen Nasional.
Kharizmi, M. (2015). Kesulitan Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi. Jupendas: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 11–21.
Lestari, F. L., & Ratnaningsih, N. (2022). Analisis Problematika dan Pencapaian Siswa dalam Pelaksanaan AKM pada Ptm Terbatas. JPG: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 3(1), 1–7.
Linanda, T., & Hendriawan, D. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Baca Tulis Siswa Kelas V dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Jurnal Perseda, 5(1), 49–56.
Murtiyasa, B., & Amini, A. D. (2021). Analisis Motivasi Belajar Siswa Smp Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Era Covid-19. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 1554–1563.
Ngobut, P., & Lenny, W. J. M. (2017). Deskripsi Motivasi Belajar Siswa dan Implikasinya Terhadap Usulan Topik-topik Bimbingan. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Terapan, 1(2), 103–109.
Nudiati, D., & Sudiapermana, E. (2020). Literasi Sebagai Kecakapan Hidup Abad 21 Pada Mahasiswa. Indonesia Journal of Learning Education and Counseling, 3(1), 34–40.
Nurhasanah, S., & Sobandi, A. (2016). Minat Belajar Sebagai Determinan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1(1), 128–135.
OECD. (2019). Programme For International Students Assessment (PISA)- Results From PISA 2018. Country Note: Indonesia. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf diunduh pada Juli 2022.
Oktiani, I. (2017). Kreativitas Guru dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Kependidikan, 5(2), 216–232.
Pamungkas, C. T. (2017). Analisis Motivasi dan Minat Belajar Matematika Siswa Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri di Kota Malang. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
PIRLS. (2011). PIRLS 2011 International Report. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pirls/pirls2011.asp%0A
Pusmendik.Kemendikbud. (2022). pengskoran AKM Literasi. Pusmendik.Kemendikbud. Pusmendik.Kemendikbud.go.id
Safitri, V., & Dafit, F. (2021). Peran Guru dalam Pembelajaran Membaca dan Menulis Melalui Gerakan Literasi di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1356–1364.
Setiawan, H., Aji, S. M. W., & Aziz, A. (2019). Puisi Berbasis Hasil Karya Gambar: Upaya Penguatan Literasi Siswa SD Kelas Tinggi. Inteligensi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 50–60.
Subandiyah, H. (2015). Pembelajaran Literasi dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Paramasastra: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 2(1), 111–123.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suprihatin, S. (2015). Upaya Guru dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. JURNAL PROMOSI Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi UM Metro, 3(1), 73–82.
Tan, C. (2017). PISA And Education Reform In Shanghai. Critical Studies in Education, 60(3), 1–15.
Wahyuni, L., Andani, M., Afrianti, Y., & Andini, C. (2017). Analisis Motivasi Belajar Pada Siswa Kelas. Gravity, 3(1), 90–99.
Wandasari, Y. (2017). Implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS) sebagai Pembentuk Pendidikan Berkarakter. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 1(1), 325–343.
Webster, M. (2004). Merriam Webster’s Collegate Dictionary. Merriam Webster Incorporated.
Wiratsiwi, W. (2020). Penerapan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar. Refleksi Edukatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 10(2), 230–238.
Zahrudin, M., Ismail, S., & Yuliati Zakiah, Q. (2021). Policy Analysis of Implementation of Minimum Competency Assessment As an Effort To Improve Reading Literacy of Students in Schools. Paedagori : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 12(1), 83–91.
Copyright (c) 2023 GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia uses an Open Access Policy under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Ghancaran Journal holds the copyright and grants the journal rights for first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
The work is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any media or format and adapt, remix, change, and develop the material even for commercial purposes, as long as it is stated credit and license derivative works under similar terms. - Authors may make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published work version.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during submission, as doing so may lead to productive exchange.